Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Joe Bear
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Wanderlai said:

The only thing keeping the ACC alive is the Grant of Rights deal that has a massive buyout but that number is dropping each year. There is no real world option where the ACC can get a better tv package. The top schools will go SEC or BIG for all that money. The leftovers will either form some low rent option or get absorbed by big 12 and big east. It sucks but the ACC is toast. 

Facts. I think virtually everyone has accepted this and is trying to cut their deals behind the scenes. NC legislature will probably try to tie NCSU to UNC because they pretty much know that NCSU will basically become NCSU if they don't. Their only hope of keeping NCSU relevant is to try to tie them to UNC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Facts. I think virtually everyone has accepted this and is trying to cut their deals behind the scenes. NC legislature will probably try to tie NCSU to UNC because they pretty much know that NCSU will basically become NCSU if they don't. Their only hope of keeping NCSU relevant is to try to tie them to UNC.

That part will be very interesting. I don’t think the SEC or B1G want a package deal and forced to take State. Where does Duke go??? It’s going to get crazy in the next couple of years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Wanderlai said:

That part will be very interesting. I don’t think the SEC or B1G want a package deal and forced to take State. Where does Duke go??? It’s going to get crazy in the next couple of years. 

UNC has already talked to SEC. 

Right now it looks like UNC, FL St, Clemson and Virginia to the SEC. Dunno where the rest would go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...