Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread

Joe Bear

By Joe Bear,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PappyMay Mentor

PappyMay

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I know a lot of people think the Oregon QB is going back to school but I think that would be insane. Him and Mendoza look like the only guys who should go in the 1st this year.

This has got to be the most overhyped preseason QB class of all time.

Agreed. Allar, Nussmeir, and Klubnik all went away 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeelsPanthersCanes Experienced

HeelsPanthersCanes

Posted
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They'll probably still go with a close loss but they better wakeup. If they get blown out they'll be in trouble.

The amount of chaos coming the CFP committee's way is comical.  

Bama loses and gets in as a 3 loss team vs Miami a 2 loss team.  Your truest comp (according to the CFP committee's "rules") of the two is Bama lost badly at FSU and Miami won at FSU.  For the record I think Bama is better than Miami, but historically the CFP has always said like opponents results is a huge factor when there is no head to head.

Bama wins, does the SEC champ jump to 4, over Oregon, Ole Miss and A&M who didn't play today.  But OU is sitting in front of Bama, and OU beat Bama in Tuscaloosa, so OU, who also didn't play today would jump 5 spots including three teams who were ahead of them and also didn't play based on their head to head with Bama, according to the CFP's "rules".

Notre Dame / Miami, if Dook wins you'll have JMU as a 4 TD dog to whoever they play, Tulane will be at least a 13.5 point dog to whoever they play. 

The real travesty in all of this is we won't get to see Diego Pavia and his entire family arrested in a coke binge rage during them losing the Sugar Bowl. 

Edited by HeelsPanthersCanes
Link to comment
Share on other sites
toldozer Grand Master

toldozer

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

The amount of chaos coming the CFP committee's way is comical.  

Bama loses and gets in as a 3 loss team vs Miami a 2 loss team.  Your truest comp (according to the CFP committee's "rules") of the two is Bama lost badly at FSU and Miami won at FSU.  For the record I think Bama is better than Miami, but historically the CFP has always said like opponents results is a huge factor when there is no head to head.

Bama wins, does the SEC champ jump to 4, over Oregon, Ole Miss and A&M who didn't play today.  But OU is sitting in front of Bama, and OU beat Bama in Tuscaloosa, so OU, who also didn't play today would jump 5 spots including three teams who were ahead of them and also didn't play based on their head to head with Bama, according to the CFP's "rules".

Notre Dame / Miami, if Dook wins you'll have JMU as a 4 TD dog to whoever they play, Tulane will be at least a 13.5 point dog to whoever they play. 

The real travesty in all of this is we won't get to see Diego Pavia and his entire family arrested in a coke binge rage during them losing the Sugar Bowl. 

Duke in no way deserves to get in but if they beat the breaks off of Virginia I could see them putting them in above jmu

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeelsPanthersCanes Experienced

HeelsPanthersCanes

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Duke in no way deserves to get in but if they beat the breaks off of Virginia I could see them putting them in above jmu

No chance Dook is in under any scenario.  My mention of them was simply to point out JMU would get in, and that would be ridiculous as JMU would be an underdog to half of any D-1 college football team if not more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bear Hands
      So is Legette getting traded?

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Can't keep pining for what never happened....but for god sakes, DeJean, Frazier... and we got this dude in a R1 trade up.  The most notable blunder of this era, that's for sure. 
    • WestPanthers
      a tip of the cap to the Special Juan

      By WestPanthers · Posted

      Thanks !
    • Bear Hands
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
×
×
  • Create New...