Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2023 vs. 2025 WR Rooms


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Physically gifted. Better? 

Not really. Your implication was that he was a talent with bad coaching. He’s on his 4th team in 5 years and we gave him 3 years to show something. He was just a bad pick and as a WR in the NFL, he’s not gifted in any way.

Also, he was waived in late August of last year so Canales had plenty of time to observe him and didn’t want him either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WhoKnows said:

Not really. Your implication was that he was a talent with bad coaching. He’s on his 4th team in 5 years and we gave him 3 years to show something. He was just a bad pick and as a WR in the NFL, he’s not gifted in any way.

Also, he was waived in late August of last year so Canales had plenty of time to observe him and didn’t want him either.

TMJ was a bad pick but on paper and in evaluations he looked like a very physically gifted receiver. It sort of reminds me of Xavier except Xavier has a sort of cult following due to going to USC. 
 

It was his rookie year but bro straight up lost the Eagles game last year. TMJ never lost us a game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

TMJ was a bad pick but on paper and in evaluations he looked like a very physically gifted receiver. It sort of reminds me of Xavier except Xavier has a sort of cult following due to going to USC. 
 

It was his rookie year but bro straight up lost the Eagles game last year. TMJ never lost us a game. 

TMJ was terrible and straight up quit on routes. That definitely loses you games. You may not see it the same from the couch as the guy who actually put in effort to get open and dropped a pass, but not running your route and the QB taking a sack or giving up on a would be touchdown loses games just the same. Just saying. For all his faults, XL is light years better than TMJ.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

TMJ was terrible and straight up quit on routes. That definitely loses you games. You may not see it the same from the couch as the guy who actually put in effort to get open and dropped a pass, but not running your route and the QB taking a sack or giving up on a would be touchdown loses games just the same. Just saying. For all his faults, XL is light years better than TMJ.

Gordon Ramsay Yes GIF by BBC

I still have my reservations about XL but this is a very good distinction.  Give me XL all day over TMJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

TMJ was a bad pick but on paper and in evaluations he looked like a very physically gifted receiver. It sort of reminds me of Xavier except Xavier has a sort of cult following due to going to USC. 
 

It was his rookie year but bro straight up lost the Eagles game last year. TMJ never lost us a game. 

eh, blaming XL for the losing the Eagles game is like blaming a kicker for missing the kick at the end of the game and ignoring all the other massive bad play that came before the final bad play

he should of caught the ball.  That drop IMO has been drastically over sold in the XL hate.  Given the QB play on the year on his role and situation he was in as a rookie. 

after that drop, we still converted the next play on 3rd down to setup a first.  We then essentially gained 1 yard in the next 4 attempts.  Philly took over after our failed 4th and 9 attempt.  Lot of ugly in that game. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

Not really. Your implication was that he was a talent with bad coaching. He’s on his 4th team in 5 years and we gave him 3 years to show something. He was just a bad pick and as a WR in the NFL, he’s not gifted in any way.

Also, he was waived in late August of last year so Canales had plenty of time to observe him and didn’t want him either.

TMJ presents the issue w/ drafting role players on powerhouse teams.  You don't know how good they are. because they are almost in can't fail situations.  His best season was with Joe Burrow, Justin Jefferson, Jamar Chase.......heck, I could go out there and catch a pass because no one going to think about me.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
On 8/7/2025 at 6:02 PM, Davidson Deac II said:

I will be glad when September gets here, so we can start talking about how they are doing instead of how they might do.  

That being said, I don't think think we will play that well at first, and we could end up 1-3 after the first four games, but we will hopefully get better as the season goes along.  

I am happy with the way things turned out.  We looked bad early, but with two of our losses coming against two of the three best teams we played (Jacksonville, NE, and Seattle).  

Now we just need to keep improving next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's one thing that drives me insane, and speaks to the conservative nature of Bryce and Canales.  You drafted TMac for a reason...toss it deep in those scenarios and maybe draw a flag or your volleyball player makes the play. It's an arm punt if nothing else, oh well. The 20% chance the play works is worth more to me than 10-15 yards of field position a lot of the time. 
    • If people are going to be up in arms over a what amounts to nothing more than a fantasy poll then the options could use some work. No competition in 2026 for the QB who is the third highest paid player on the roster and has started the first three consecutive years of his career playing poorly at best is a nonstarter for a lot of people and if anyone needs that explained to them maybe they should go back and give themselves a refresher course on the history of this franchise. As far as the other option even if we do lose against the Rams the team is still going to pick up Bryce's 5th let's be real. And even then it still isn't a given we will see legitimate competition. When it comes to winning the division and being in the playoffs I do think the majority of Panthers fans are happy about it and would be happy to see us finally win another playoff game but unfortunately you can't just put aside the elephant in the room and the baggage that comes with it. And dismissing these concerns as just people not being real fans or whatever cringy variation of labels being applied is only carrying water for the Tepper's. Such is only going to illicit eye rolls.
    • It has to be A on this poll. If he shows up in the Playoffs? That's where you need your QB to succeed. So yeah, you go into next year with him as your starter.   More realistic and worst case scenario. He looks... fine. He doesn't play well enough to win us the game. He doesn't play bad enough to be acknowledged as the problem. And so we spend another off-season paralyzed. Not feeling like he was bad enough that we need to make a move, but not good enough to be our QB of the future. So we end up loading up for another year of Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde Bryce and mediocre ball. 
×
×
  • Create New...