Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN: "Future" Power Rankings


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, UnluckyforSome said:

Centers are usually easier to find than left tackles, as there is a difference in the necessary physical skill. Centers don't need to be dancing bears to be considered the best at their position. They do need to be stout enough to be an obstacle in the A gap, and they need to be smart enough to call out coverages.

Very true, but with that said we havent had an above average center (or LT) in quite some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UnluckyforSome said:

100%. It's a little bit of splitting hairs on what position is most important though, and there is some nuance as the roles are different. 

But I think the general point the poster is trying to make is that we need to spend probably some premium draft capital to acquire a high end center prospect.   I dont know maybe one in the 2nd instead of a hurt running back

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

But I think the general point the poster is trying to make is that we need to spend probably some premium draft capital to acquire a high end center prospect.   I dont know maybe one in the 2nd instead of a hurt running back

The best center we have ever had was a 2nd rounder. There are always options later in the draft, but then it is more of a question of effective scouting, and that, for whatever reason, has never been a strong point for us.

Personally, I think we have Moton's replacement already on the roster, but we have been playing him at left tackle instead. So not sure if there is a future center on the roster, maybe it's Mayes, but I am of the opinion that you draft for oline every year and always have someone in the pipeline. We do not do that really.

Edited by UnluckyforSome
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point they actually have to prove they are not a bottom 5 team before anyone not selling clicks or tuning in to watch for fun to believe. 

Have they improved? Sure. Are they good? It does not appear that way at this point. Lots of best case scenarios would have to happen for that to be true and given our history I think I have better odds on a $2 loto ticket winning a jackpot.  

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, CRA said:

I mean, when you actually start putting player vs player?  I don't think it's controversial.  Carolina still almost fully banking on hope that dudes pan out for a high % of the agreement here.  So proven edges out potential when you start putting them head to head. 

 

The Colts might be debatable, but the Giants? Have you seen that roster? It's easily worse than ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

The Colts might be debatable, but the Giants? Have you seen that roster? It's easily worse than ours.

I mean, the Giants suck.  Don't get me wrong.  Neither of us have much. 

They got the best player as of right now on both sides of the ball though. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, the Giants suck.  Don't get me wrong.  Neither of us have much. 

They got the best player as of right now on both sides of the ball though. 

 

The Giants aren't even remotely comparable. We would kill to have the amount of talent that they do. On both sides of the ball.

Now. I will say that the sources in this thread did have them ranked only 29th, so not that far from us. I think they are very heavily weighted towards the upper end of the scale in a head to head.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

The Giants aren't even remotely comparable. We would kill to have the amount of talent that they do. On both sides of the ball.

Now. I will say that the sources in this thread did have them ranked only 29th, so not that far from us. I think they are very heavily weighted towards the upper end of the scale in a head to head.

They have a good oline and their d could be legit as well.  When Burns is your 3ish best pass rusher that means you are loaded on the dline.   Not even going to mention Nabors

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Only thing I really see it doing is possibly making Tepper listen if a different play caller can't run the offense because of limitations. New hire, someone who hasn't been watching Bryce for the past 3 years up close may be able to talk some sense if he sees that he isn't able to get the job done. 
    • Thought I'd get a one-stop shop for all Combine and 2026 NFL Draft prospect chatter.  Combine kicks off on Thursday and runs through this coming Sunday.  Here are a few links to surface level resources about partcipants and recent analysis.... Combine Participants Invite List DJ's Top 50 List Combine Preview from USA Today Fastest Underwear Olympian 2026   Guys to keep an eye on at pick 19: Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/caleb-lomu/32004c4f-4d71-9974-81d5-d7ddcc67cbb9 Monroe Freeling, OT, UGA - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/monroe-freeling/32004652-4513-6741-dc94-a0bffd434894 Peter Woods, DT, Clemson - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/peter-woods/3200574f-4f54-6776-1e31-85779d355391 Kayden McDonald, DT, OSU - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/kayden-mcdonald/32004d43-4441-1150-8b23-7d300cdf4ff2 Caleb Banks, DT, Florida - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/caleb-banks/32004241-4e41-4915-7867-f5ec0fc4dc5b CJ Allen, LB, UGA - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/cj-allen/3200414c-4c08-1937-3608-0c6af9b0566c Anthony Hill, Jr., LB, Texas - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/anthony-hill-jr./32004849-4c73-5988-1a1b-63b20f02e7d4 Akheem Mesidor, EDGE, Miami - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/akheem-mesidor/32004d45-5325-0563-1424-b241e637c932 Cashius Howell, EDGE, TAMU - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/cashius-howell/3200484f-5752-6021-24a1-b509c0618eb6 Keldrick Faulk, EDGE, Auburn - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/keldric-faulk/32004641-5512-4764-ae52-890ece1e0c76 TJ Parker, EDGE, Clemson - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/t.j.-parker/32005041-5242-9755-38a8-f013e41a52f2 Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, SAF, Toledo - https://www.nfl.com/prospects/emmanuel-mcneil-warren/32004d43-4e70-9443-e03a-a3fdc7a8ef2c
    • Not sure there is anything that will do that outside of Young actually being a legit top 12 QB. Where he won’t need excuses made for him.  It is just as likely to multiply them. 
×
×
  • Create New...