Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Austin named starting center


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I am not comfortable really saying any of that until it starts happening on the field. I am hopeful that is the case and it appears we are better there than in 2024 but nothing is ever assured with the Tepper Panthers. We will just have to watch and hope.

I will give them that the team has had so many needs over the last few offseasons that center can get pushed down the priority list. Most of our attempts have ultimately failed there, while we passed on excellent centers in the draft...mostly to draft busts, even worse.

As for the development, yeah, we seem to struggle with it but it's the age old question of is it evaluation OR development? It's not like we have many(if any) examples of guys not working out here and then flourishing elsewhere. I think our evaluation is far more broken than our development.

 

8 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I agree about the evaluations being more broken but then the development hasn't been impressive either IMO.  

 

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, it's really hard to know the full equation without insiders basically talking about it.

Either way it tilts, it has to improve if we have any hope of pulling out of this hole.

In many of the cases, it's been an equal split to both for a very specific reason

We clearly spent a number of years following the old Al Davis method of drafting and looking for the unicorn athletes and hope we can coach them up to being great NFL players, and it clearly hasn't worked.

So it was bad evaluating to fall in love with raw physical ability and then it was bad development to turn them into quality players, all around failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

 

 

In many of the cases, it's been an equal split to both for a very specific reason

We clearly spent a number of years following the old Al Davis method of drafting and looking for the unicorn athletes and hope we can coach them up to being great NFL players, and it clearly hasn't worked.

So it was bad evaluating to fall in love with raw physical ability and then it was bad development to turn them into quality players, all around failure.

It's been a mixed bag, we also just straight drafted guys that didn't have the physical abilities to play in the NFL at all. We have been even more scatterbrained in our approach than the vintage Raiders, IMO. 

You knew they were straight up Underwear Olympics Gold Medalists. We have been all over the fuging map.

Rhule was heavy RAS. That's definitely true.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

It's been a mixed bag, we also just straight drafted guys that didn't have the physical abilities to play in the NFL at all. We have been even more scatterbrained in our approach than the vintage Raiders, IMO. 

You knew they were straight up Underwear Olympics Gold Medalists. We have been all over the fuging map.

Rhule was heavy RAS. That's definitely true.

Mixed bag I can agree on. Rhule was obvious but now it's all over the place. They also injected leaning into PFFs grades this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...