Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coach asked about Coker!!

Doc LRB

By Doc LRB,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Forget bubble, they need to be asking if he's gonna replace XL in the starting lineup.

I think XL gets the nod to "save face."

Not sure that the season is going to be able to hide the fact that Coker appears far more prepared for the NFL currently than XL.

  • Pie 9
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Forget bubble, they need to be asking if he's gonna replace XL in the starting lineup.

This is why you stay away from drafting 1-year wonders in the first round. 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Forget bubble, they need to be asking if he's gonna replace XL in the starting lineup.

Thats what I'm saying. Why TF would Coker be on the bubble when he's outplayed XL in every way possible? I wouldn't even bat an eye if Coker stole the majority of XL's reps. 

  • Pie 10
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think XL gets the nod to "save face."

Not sure that the season is going to be able to hide the fact that Coker appears far more prepared for the NFL currently than XL.

That's what I expect too but if XL doesn't impress I hope they have a quick trigger finger on making the change.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Thats what I'm saying. Why TF would Coker be on the bubble when he's outplayed XL in every way possible? I wouldn't even bat an eye if Coker stole the majority of XL's reps. 

Even without this TC/offseason, Coker proved that last year too. 

He is simply the far better prepared NFL player. 

I get the ceiling difference, I think we all do. But if you can't reach that ceiling, what was it worth?

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

This is why you stay away from drafting 1-year wonders in the first round. 

That's why I didn't want him. He basically did nothing in college until a super senior year that wouldn't have even happened had it not been for NCAA COVID year policy. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
therealmjl Grand Master

therealmjl

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's why I didn't want him. He basically did nothing in college until a super senior year that wouldn't have even happened had it not been for NCAA COVID year policy. 

Can you name his quarterbacks before Rattler arrived?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's why I didn't want him. He basically did nothing in college until a super senior year that wouldn't have even happened had it not been for NCAA COVID year policy. 

The trade up into the 1st still infuriates me. Height of fuging hubris.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, therealmjl said:

Can you name his quarterbacks before Rattler arrived?

 

Oh give me a break. Plenty of first round NFL WRs played with trash QBs. Look at T-Mac. I'm sure Coker had a John Elway throwing to him at fuging Holy Cross. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...