Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Re-claiming this Board


XClown1986
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CPantherKing said:

Very true.

I think we all just want to see a positive trend upward, and when the Panthers look like a 5/6 win team, we will hear why they are that team. There have been some positive changes, but it has been too slow. The team is responsible for giving the fan base something to watch and at least be competitive. We all want to win and build a champion, but true fans will boo and put bags on their heads while still buying tickets and gear because they want to see a change for the positive. It's not the fan's responsibility to pull up the team and coddle their emotions. Our responsibility as a fan is to give our honest feedback and pressure the team to become a champion. If the players break because of the fans, then you likely don't have a champion caliber player.

This board has stayed true to the fan. Rah rahs for their favorite players in bad times are always welcome, but not everyone will be a rah rah, and there will be fans that don't eternally hope for a player - especially on a consistently under performing team.

I'm sure some will call this trolling too and I will get the poo. Oh well

Ive said it 100x on here.  Just get to .500 (or better) going into week 5.  Thats it, easy enough, do that and lets go from there.  Baby steps and all.   As a harsh critic of this team that is what is beaten into me at this point, just be .500 and Ill be moderately happy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two thoughts.  

1.  In terms of talking football online, the archaic huddle is about as least toxic as it can get.   The modern social media sites are way more toxic than the vintage message board format here. 

2.  People always look back and create a version of the huddle that didn't really exist.  In fact, I would argue there were windows where people were way harder and angrier about Jake freaking Delhomme than they have ever been about Bryce Young (which is really more apathetic than anger). 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Two thoughts.  

1.  In terms of talking football online, the archaic huddle is about as least toxic as it can get.   The modern social media sites are way more toxic than the vintage message board format here. 

2.  People always look back and create a version of the huddle that didn't really exist.  In fact, I would argue there were windows where people were way harder and angrier about Jake freaking Delhomme than they have ever been about Bryce Young (which is really more apathetic than anger). 

Hell, you still had some fans grumbling about Cam during an MVP season. LOL 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, you still had some fans grumbling about Cam during an MVP season. LOL 

I once had people verbally rip my head of and poo down my neck because I didn't think paying 2 RBs featured money at the same time was a good way to build a football team.    But yeah, it was never weird back in the day. 

heck folks made a friendly Panther just trying to hustle a new business run away because....yeah, the huddle always has been the huddle.  It's our GM now.  But this place never was what some like to recall it was. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

Two thoughts.  

1.  In terms of talking football online, the archaic huddle is about as least toxic as it can get.   The modern social media sites are way more toxic than the vintage message board format here. 

2.  People always look back and create a version of the huddle that didn't really exist.  In fact, I would argue there were windows where people were way harder and angrier about Jake freaking Delhomme than they have ever been about Bryce Young (which is really more apathetic than anger). 

Thank you. I mean, it's pretty light/tame right now and has been FAR FAR worse at times.  Bwood/TRD days, early Cam years (King T/there was some insane stuff around 2012-2013), it's really not much different.  If anything, I'd argue it was the most heated here after Cam was drafted but before we became perennial contenders.  Those few years were YIKES (Along with needing to ignore everything posted by Chuck)  

If anything, traffic is a bit light and there's not a ton of conversation going due to changing times.  And it's not like new people are discovering this place in droves.  Many of us are young-X to Millenial that have grown up with the board, nowadays have kids and/or sh*t going on.  It's the end of summer, people are taking vacations, kids are starting school, just are out and abooout.  

I'll just encourage anyone wanting it better to drop in the content to get stuff going.  

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Thank you. I mean, it's pretty light/tame right now and has been FAR FAR worse at times.  Bwood/TRD days, early Cam years (King T/there was some insane stuff around 2012-2013), it's really not much different.  If anything, I'd argue it was the most heated here after Cam was drafted but before we became perennial contenders.  Those few years were YIKES (Along with needing to ignore everything posted by Chuck)  

If anything, traffic is a bit light and there's not a ton of conversation going due to changing times.  And it's not like new people are discovering this place in droves.  Many of us are young-X to Millenial that have grown up with the board, nowadays have kids and/or sh*t going on.  It's the end of summer, people are taking vacations, kids are starting school, just are out and abooout.  

I'll just encourage anyone wanting it better to drop in the content to get stuff going.  

 

 

Yeah, it's honestly a lot more volatile when emotions run high. Apathy is the overall general fanbase vibe in recent years.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, it's honestly a lot more volatile when emotions run high. Apathy is the overall general fanbase vibe in recent years.

I don't think it would be so bad if the Huddle as a whole hadn't been so right so many times about common sense things. I haven't seen anything that has given me any hope that this team can make good decisions starting with Tepper. Its just one comically bad failure after another.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I don't think it would be so bad if the Huddle as a whole hadn't been so right so many times about common sense things. I haven't seen anything that has given me any hope that this team can make good decisions starting with Tepper. Its just one comically bad failure after another.

I've said numerous times during the Tepper era that the Panthers would honestly be better off making major decisions via poll on the Huddle and that's just fuging sad. LOL 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gas-lighting in this thread is laughable. So lets get a couple of things straight:

1. I'm not romanticizing the huddle of old. There were always annoyances and arguments and people losing their heads. The difference? They were outliers. The reason you can remember guys like Chuck is because they stood out as the problem. And they were reacted to and dealt with accordingly without it being necessary to run tattling to mods. There was an expectation of how you carried yourself and how you responded to others. That has become increasingly flexible. That's a fact.

2. The fact that the team sucks, the owner sucks, the coach sucks, or whatever the flavor of the moment is, doesn't give immunity to your behavior and interaction with others. We have far too many people with the inability to manage themselves and they simply shrug off any culpability because the team "isn't winning" and simply say they have a right to criticize the team. Yes you do, but you don't have the right to demean or demoralize others or continually derail threads with constant verbal bashing and criticisms. Your behavior and interactions are on you. Period. Be critical of the team, the owner, whomever. But its the interactions with other posters and with topics that is the problem.

 

 

Edited by XClown1986
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...