Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Observer Projections / *Updated Panthers Waiver Additions


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Seriously! Can't fathom why we have a connection to SC! Clempson should be our go-to in the Carolinas. Gamecocks are overrated/injured all the time

Are you really going to pretend that SCar's overall pool of talent vs. Clemson's is even a debate during the Panthers' existence? I mean, I'm a huge UNC fan but I'm not going to humiliate myself trying to make that argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

https://motorcyclesports.net/nfl/jim-harbaugh-praises-dalevon-campbells-standout-preseason-as-unexpected-weapon-for-chargers-offense-in-final-roster-push/

Jim Harbaugh praises Dalevon Campbell’s standout preseason as unexpected weapon for Chargers’ offense in final roster push

in 6 years of college football...he saw the endzone 3 times.  Dude is not a weapon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tr3ach said:

We are obsessed with big straight line speed receivers.

Dave Canales warned/told folks......he isn't creative.  That's not what he does.  He is just going to do what he does.  I'm 100% convinced that's why Renfrow as cut.  Renfrow in no way fits the scheme.   

and this season is going to be horrible as the NFL adjust to the one year film of Bryce Young in the scheme he doesn't fit.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Guys let's not go off the deep end over Renfrow.

Canales success or failure will come down to whether or not he develops these young players.

Dave Canales success or failure ultimately comes down to Bryce Young.  And the Panthers have never played a game that caters to Bryce Young. 

Canales missed his window.  No way he gets time to part w/ Bryce and start his rebuild year 3 from scratch....with 2 bad years to his name.  Nothing says David Tepper would allow that. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Are you really going to pretend that SCar's overall pool of talent vs. Clemson's is even a debate during the Panthers' existence? I mean, I'm a huge UNC fan but I'm not going to humiliate myself trying to make that argument.

Outside of Jaycee (who is injury prone), everyone else has been disappointing. Just tired of the Gamecocks at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oddly feeling really good about tonight. fug the heat
    • Here are my takeaways from the conference (IMO): - Is Dan against taking a WR 3 years in a row? No. Would that be his preference? Also, no. Not by a long shot.  - I think draft gurus are wrong. Tight end is not an early priority. They like the guys in the building enough to see them develop, but a later round guy is being looked at (just seemed like he was able to label a couple of guys "talented", but stopped short of suggesting the class is good at the top. Seemed quick to talk about the depth of the class) - If we are taking a DL, it will be in the top 2 rounds. They fall off a cliff at some point soon after. - They are targeting guys in each round. I think we are more likely to move up than down in this draft to prevent missing out on a guy. He doesn't want to give up a lot though, man loves his draft picks. - DBs are a priority. We want to come away with a safety and a nickel. Maybe even a safety that can play nickel. Thieneman sounds more and more like a real possibility, if he is there. We are taking a safety in the first 2 rounds, if I had to put money on it. - Age matters more for 1st round picks, probably (Mesidor), but not for after that (Stukes). - They have a guy or two that they want in the 1st round, but crazy things DO happen in the draft, and they may shift gears and take a different guy if someone falls that they didn't expect to be there.  - Character matters. A LOT. If a guy has character concerns of any kind, you can be pretty confident they aren't on our board. They may bring in a guy or two for a visit to gauge the validity/severity of the concern though.      
    • Yeah don't wanna see anyone get hurt.  Hopefully Chatters is sitting.
×
×
  • Create New...