Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OFFICIAL Week 1: Panthers @ Jaguars Game Day Thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Mills said:

THIS. Only 3 of the 14 playoff teams last year run a 3-4 and the Ravens were the only to advance. Granted 2 of them (bal/pit) played each other, but the numbers are eerily similar every single year. Where tf are all of our PFF/analysis guys?

We were always a better 4-3 team....LBs are not a strength for us...he'll DB isn't a strength for us....HELL DEFENSE isn't our strength

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Dave Canales says he does think he had the team prepared for today. "The physical readiness was there." He adds that he has to look at himself to see what more he could have done. #Panthers

mm

Is it weird that this makes me like him more at the moment?

Rhule would have tossed the entire team under the bus, but Canales steps up after almost the entire team looked terrible (and half the time due to their own dumb mistakes that have nothing to do with the coaching) and said he was the problem and not the players.

It does show some leadership to do that and I kinda like it, but man, post ass kicking pressers aren't going to help us win games or win over the fans, need to turn it into wins.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Almost all the high cost players (high contract players, and draft picks) fit a 3-4. It would be very painful and take a long time to flip this defense back to a 4-3. 

Completely disagree. We have no linebackers at all and I think all the olbs and de dts would fit fine in a 4-3

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
    • He had the award until like the last 8 games. He sucked ass and flagg had 3 40 point games
×
×
  • Create New...