Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why is Canalas so pass happy?


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mike2.0 said:

Until the QB play improves, this team’s offense should be built around the running game. Whether that appeals to the powers that be shouldn’t matter since the Super Bowl champs are built around the running game. 

Sure, can't fault that thinking

But when you still throw it 30 times in a game, more than 8 should be going to your best player when nobody else can crack the 31 yard mark and said best player caught all 6 of the catchable targets.

This is basically the same argument as the people who weren't upset with us not opening up the playbook in the big win agains the Falcons.  Just because we won, doesn't mean our coaching staff called a good game and thus they aren't absolved of criticism.  

Winning in spite of your coaching decisions isn't a good thing.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Johnstonny said:

I like a strong passing game...we have invested in WR's TE's...we have 2 studs at RB.... we have spent huge on the line....we should be able to dictate and impose on the defense....theres something missing tho...not sure what it is...lol

An NFL level QB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, RJK said:

The identity of this team is clearly run heavy but I think tepper wants a fun to watch throwing the ball all over the field team that sells tickets. So canales is trying his best with a toddler at QB. 

I do wish Canales had a John Fox streak in him. he would get a wild hair, and it would be we are gonna run it every play until they stop it. 

Edited by strato
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

I like a strong passing game...we have invested in WR's TE's...we have 2 studs at RB.... we have spent huge on the line....we should be able to dictate and impose on the defense....theres something missing tho...not sure what it is...lol

Even with the injuries on OL, if we had a real NFL QB it would be a good offense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, coastliner said:

I'm sorry but this is just dumb.  This season is about one thing and one thing only:  evaluating Bryce.  Nothing else matters.

Every time he throws it to T-Mac, it makes me angry.  Why?  Anyone can throw to that guy, he's too good.  What do we learn when Bryce makes another completion to T-Mac?  We learn nothing, it's just a waste.

We need throws to third string rookie TEs.  We need our OL to let at least one rusher through into Bryce's face every play.  That's the only way we can know if Bryce is our future.

Unfortunately it's not that simple. We are learning ball placement still matters regardless of who the receiver is. It's like anything beyond ten yards is constantly a 50/50 ball unless the receiver is just wide open. It is incredibly frustrating.

I do agree we need to spread reps around for the rest of the young guys too. But we drafted this kid 8th overall the first time we've ever drafted a WR that high. You have to try and get him the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

Unfortunately it's not that simple. We are learning ball placement still matters regardless of who the receiver is. It's like anything beyond ten yards is constantly a 50/50 ball unless the receiver is just wide open. It is incredibly frustrating.

I do agree we need to spread reps around for the rest of the young guys too. But we drafted this kid 8th overall the first time we've ever drafted a WR that high. You have to try and get him the ball.

Him being as good as he is, and not having a TD is shameful. I’m not going all Tuka worship on him but we nailed that pick. 
 

Gonna add though, if the guys around him can do anything, he will get his TDs. Might be a thing that once he gets the first one the damn breaks. But we need a different QB for that probably. 

Edited by strato
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, strato said:

Him being as good as he is, and not having a TD is shameful. I’m not going all Tuka worship on him but we nailed that pick. 
 

Gonna add though, if the guys around him can do anything, he will get his TDs. Might be a thing that once he gets the first one the damn breaks. But we need a different QB for that probably. 

T-Mac not having a TD yet has nothing to do with the other guys around him and what they're doing, it's 100% because we haven't even tried to get him one through 5 games.

Sure, it's hard to knock them on the times we've scored, with a bunch of TE TDs, the Renfrow TDs, XL, and some rushing ones.

But through 5 games, I think he has a single red zone target in I think the 2nd game where Bryce tried to throw one up to him in the corner from the 5 yard line but somehow threw it behind him and the ball never even reached the goal line.

That's also my frustration, how do you have a red zone weapon like him and not try a single jump ball in the end zone through 5 games.  It would be one thing if he never had the opportunities, but I'd say we've had a good 20 snaps from inside the 10 yard line so far this year, another dozen or more from the 10-20, but we still haven't thrown that end zone jump ball to him one time.

It's baffling to have that kind of weapon and not even try it one time yet.

And yea, I owe my obsession with him, but I mean, I went to a non football school, he was our best player in school history and my favorite Wildcat.  So yea, I'm admittedly and knowingly a little obsessed with him now that we've drafted him, and I want to see him succeed.  

But my own hang ups aside, he's on pace for 1,200 yards and we haven't used him correctly yet this season, he's lead us in receiving each week and he's still used as a decoy more than a target.

Make it make sense?!?!?!?!

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

T-Mac not having a TD yet has nothing to do with the other guys around him and what they're doing, it's 100% because we haven't even tried to get him one through 5 games.

Sure, it's hard to knock them on the times we've scored, with a bunch of TE TDs, the Renfrow TDs, XL, and some rushing ones.

But through 5 games, I think he has a single red zone target in I think the 2nd game where Bryce tried to throw one up to him in the corner from the 5 yard line but somehow threw it behind him and the ball never even reached the goal line.

That's also my frustration, how do you have a red zone weapon like him and not try a single jump ball in the end zone through 5 games.  It would be one thing if he never had the opportunities, but I'd say we've had a good 20 snaps from inside the 10 yard line so far this year, another dozen or more from the 10-20, but we still haven't thrown that end zone jump ball to him one time.

It's baffling to have that kind of weapon and not even try it one time yet.

And yea, I owe my obsession with him, but I mean, I went to a non football school, he was our best player in school history and my favorite Wildcat.  So yea, I'm admittedly and knowingly a little obsessed with him now that we've drafted him, and I want to see him succeed.  

But my own hang ups aside, he's on pace for 1,200 yards and we haven't used him correctly yet this season, he's lead us in receiving each week and he's still used as a decoy more than a target.

Make it make sense?!?!?!?!

Man…. I am on an old iPad lately and with my old eyes I have to zoom to read stuff and it obscures the avatars. But when I read one of your posts I know who it is without looking. 
 

Congratulations for being right about him but you beat it to death. One note. Same note. Like C jam blues. 
 

The people around him doing something get more attention and leave him with less. At this point he is a great decoy and needs other players to take some attention off of him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, strato said:

Man…. I am on an old iPad lately and with my old eyes I have to zoom to read stuff and it obscures the avatars. But when I read one of your posts I know who it is without looking. 
 

Congratulations for being right about him but you beat it to death. One note. Same note. Like C jam blues. 
 

The people around him doing something get more attention and leave him with less. At this point he is a great decoy and needs other players to take some attention off of him. 

We're the only team who can draft a stud playmaker who is used more as a decoy than a playmaker.

The Giants had complete poo around Nabers last year but peppered him with targets all season long, they didn't use him as a decoy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

We're the only team who can draft a stud playmaker who is used more as a decoy than a playmaker.

The Giants had complete poo around Nabers last year but peppered him with targets all season long, they didn't use him as a decoy.

I don’t think that’s true about us being the only team. Lots of teams with top WRs have had successful number twos because of all the attention the one draws. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And there are a lot of teams that fluctuate from year to year.   For example, the Lions disappointed, and the Bears and Pats overachieved.  But your stats demonstrate the point.  At the bottom 10 of the SOS (toughest schedule) for 2025, the Texans and Rams are the only teams to have winning records. In the top 10 of the SOS (weakest schedules) only the Browns and Cowboys had losing records.  So, it seems that if you have a top 10 SOS (toughest), you have an 80% chance of having a losing record.  If you have a top 10 easiest schedule, you have an 80% chance of having a winning record.  I am not seeing your point, based on these charts.  
    • This article (ESPN) got me thinking and I think on paper.  Thought I would share.  This thinking involves realistic cap analysis, needs, the draft, and free agency.  I think it realistically addresses Edge and LB fairly well.  OL (not 2026 so much, but 2027 and beyond looks good).  The free agent S has deep range and coverage skills, something that killed us on third downs last year, imo.  Beyond Edge, LB, S, and OL depth, that is about it.  I took a flyer on DT and WR depth late in the draft, but at CB (Horn, Jackson, Smith-Wade, and Thornton), QB, RB, TE, etc. we are going to rely on undrafted free agents.  No cap room left. EDGE:  In the $7m per year range, the edge from Atlanta Ebiketie got pressure at a high rate in reduced snaps. With Atlanta adding 2 edge rushers as rookies who seemed to do well (Pearce is one of them--*) but he got pressure in limited snaps at a high rate 16.9% (one in eight pass rush).   He is 27 and played in 384 snaps.  PFF Score of 74.9.  had 2 sacks.  If he had a normal workload, based on his limited play, he would have had about 5 to 6 sacks and about 60 pressures.  However, it is likely he would be rotational here, logging about 500 snaps.   A lot of this decision depends on how we feel about Princely.  If they like his development, you probably do not draft an Edge in round 1 or maybe even 2 for several reasons (and many may disagree with this logic, but a good GM has long-term vision):  1. That would give you 3 Edge contracts to negotiate in 3-4 years.  2.  Edges take time to develop.  They would peak around 2028.  The Panthers are in "win now" mode, I think. Mafe (Seahawks, PFF 69.2) is another option, but he is more along the lines of Scourton and Jones II.  He would command a contract in the $10m range. Kwity Paye (Indianapolis, PFF 68.7) He is about 28 and is expected to sign a deal around $18m per season.  I am not that impressed, but he is considered "above average."  I'd rather have Ebiketie from Atlanta for $10m per season less. Center:  The center position in the draft is looking better.  There are some short armed OTs (like Parker, Duke, et al) who will project inside (G,C). Personally, I like the Center position in this draft--let Mays walk.  Re-sign Corbett, and draft a C in round 3.   Linebacker:  I am not sure what we should do here.   I think Morgan will fall in love with Cincinnati's Golday, and we would take him at #51.  Rodriguez (Texas Tech) in round 3 could be a steal.  However, I am not sure that I see value after Styles in round 1.  I think Devin Lloyd will want elite meny and he is not elite--he is good.  He will ask for $15m per season.  Leo Chenel (KC, 75.1 PFF, est. $5m) is a much better option. Safety:  I think Kam Curl would be a great fit here. (Rams, 2 Ints 87 tackles) he is very versatile. Expected to get between $10m and $12m per year, however.  In the draft, I think they like Bud Clark who should be there in round 4.  Are Moehrig, Ransom, and Simmons enough?  Tony Adams (63.7 PFF) a deep safety known for his range.  He is expected to get a 3-year, $20m deal on the market. Based on what I am seeing here and the way I am thinking right now on 2/21, here is what I might do: Free Agency CAP: I am going to assume we can clear about $50m by restructuring the contracts of Horn, Lewis, Hunt, and Brown and cutting AShawn Robinson.  We could (bold move) extend Ickey Ekwonu--considering his situation, it could be beneficial to him long term, and his guaranteed salary could be spread over the next 3 years or so. Re-sign veterans:  OL:  Corbett ($3m), Nijman ($4m), Christensen ($2.5m--2 years $5m), Jake Curhan ($1.4m-2 years, $3m).  BC may be ready around mid season, Curhan has experience at RT and G, and played well.  He has played LT in preseason.  There is NOTHING in free agency at LT--most sucked in 2025 and/or are old.  WR: Jalen Coker ($8m--4 years, $32m), LB: Rozeboom ($3.5--2 years, $7m) Cherelus ($1m)  ST: Isiah Simmons ($1.5m).  TOTAL:  Approx. $25m New Free Agents:  Linebacker:  Leo Chenal (KC, age 26) estimated $5m. Safety:  Tony Adams, (NYJ, age 27)  estimated $7m Edge: Arnold Ebikete (Atl, age 27)  estimated $7m Draft: Round 1:  Cashius Howell, Edge Texas AM (This pick gives the Panthers a situational edge rusher to pair with Princely while Ebikete and Scourton start.  Jones II could be cut to save about $4m in cap room. Round 2: Caleb Tiernan, LT, Northwestern (Good pass protector who needs work in run blocking.  I wanted Golday LB here, but if we sign Chenel, the need is lessened at LB if we re-sign Rozeboom. Tiernan is solid). Round 3:  Jake Slaughter C, Florida (Groom behind Corbett for a while, but Slaughter is an impressive C who should be ready by 2027). Round 4:  Demetrius Crownover, RT Texas AM (This guy can develop as a backup until Moton decides to leave) Round 5:  Aiden Fisher, ILB Indiana (could be a nice fit in this system.  Smart, with special teams ability)' Round 6: Ty Montgomery, WR John Carroll Univ.  (very productive with good size and hands.  a gamble, but worth a sixth) Round 7:  James Thompson Jr.  DT, Illinois (was a beast at the Shrine bowl practices and game.  For some reason, there have been a lot of undrafted free agents and day 3 DTs succeed in the NFL.  This could be one.)                          
×
×
  • Create New...