Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our 2nd Most Productive WR


Steves89
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, cranky said:

I know the point you were making. My point is the original post stated a good QB elevates the talent around him. You are correct that Smith was better under Cam than Clausen. I agree with that. But he was also better with Delhomme than Clasuen as well. Cam didn't make Smith a better receiver - Clausen just made him worse. 

I mean, the overriding point might be that Bryce is closer to Clausen than Cam or Jake. And we see that correlating in the performance of the WRs with Bryce. 
If we could only have an NFL average passer everyone would be able to see this. 
 

Edit I should have put that last bit differently. If we had the opportunity to slot an NFL average QB in with these same WRs we might see a difference. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

I guess the point I was trying to make went completely over your head. All of those guys mentioned who were on the team in 09-11 had essentially career worst years in 2010 and must have just magically turned it around the next season. 

Or you know, the more logical explanation is that it matters significantly who is under center operating the offense.

Steve smith is basically a HoF WR and he put up 500 yards and 2 TDs with Clausen under center and the next year with a rookie Cam put up 1400 yards and 7 TDs.

You can have all the talent in the world but it doesn’t really matter if your QB sucks.

Look at what's happening now with the Bengals. Burrow is out and Chase and Higgins are "struggling" with Browning. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A wild statement for a guy who won an MVP with Ted Ginn Jr. as his #1 WR. I mean, just listen to Greg Olsen. Greg very openly gives Cam a TON of credit for how his career played out.

duplicated

Edited by cranky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A wild statement for a guy who won an MVP with Ted Ginn Jr. as his #1 WR. I mean, just listen to Greg Olsen. Greg very openly gives Cam a TON of credit for how his career played out.

I don't know that I would call that a wild statement. I mean, yeah, Ginn had a good year in 2015 but his other two years with Cam were just average. 

I absolutly do agree with the statement that Cam was a big part of Olsens career and have no problem crediting him with Olsen's wildly successful career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

So having a QB that allows an already good player to play even better wouldn’t be considered elevating to you? 

Smith had back to back sub 1k seasons with a one armed Jake Delhomme, Matt Moore, Jimmy Clausen and one game of Brian St Pierre. 

Cam 100% elevated a 32 year old Steve Smith.

If you really believe that, then there is nothing else for me to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Icege said:

 

@mav1234 Might take me a little bit to find the throws without pressure. To your earlier point, in my opinion his throws under pressure looked better more often than those without.

Let's see a career compilation instead of one that only shows the games where he "improved" last season. Because we all should be able to agree he regressed.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

We had the 32nd passing offense with Adam Thielen at 1k receiving yards in 2023 just to be clear. Maybe he just isn't the player at this stage in his career that some of you wanted him to be.

Or maybe they were 32nd because his other receivers were Jonathan Mingo, DJ Chark, and Terrace Marshall JR.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

I mean, the overriding point might be that Bryce is closer to Clausen than Cam or Jake. And we see that correlating in the performance of the WRs with Bryce. 
If we could only have an NFL average passer everyone would be able to see this. 
 

Edit I should have put that last bit differently. If we had the opportunity to slot an NFL average QB in with these same WRs we might see a difference. 

we saw a washed Dalton be inserted with Frank and Canales.....and the passing attack immediately became more threatening with the same weapons.  We know a NFL average QB (which Andy isn't) would automatically make a team more threatening than Bryce.  Not sure we need to see it for a 3rd straight season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see the Bryce crew is back to trying to gaslight people into thinking Bryce was a good deep passer last year lol.  

to that, I would merely ask the Bryce crew to post the stat line for his plays 20+ yard down field last year.  It's on the board.   It's really bad.  Just like this year.  Just like his rookie year.   Not the PFF gaslighting.  We know you can all share the PFF thought. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tremayne being a solid wr is a good thing. Xl has been mediocre so far and tmac is a legit alpha. But we need a #2 and if 2 udfa in Coker and Tremayne can fill the 2 and 3 that is stealing. Getting over 100 yards with limited snaps and with young as your qb is nothing to sneeze at. As a rookie udfa that was buried on the depth chart I can see him getting 4-500 yards this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...