Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have the 3rd leading rusher in NFL


Recommended Posts

Rico Dowdle had 18 touches on Sunday, which is still a lot. For comparison, he had 26 in the Miami game and 34 in the Dallas game, and he was getting so many touches in the last one he was cramping hard. 

I'm by no means against giving him more touches than Chuba, he's earned it, but it's not like we didn't use him. 17 carries is as many as we gave Chuba when he started in the Atlanta game.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canales keeps trying to talk about execution  and went out his way to say Chubba sprung 1 but he also put us in 2nd and 9 way often. Rico had us ahead of the sticks more often if they going by analytics.  Rico sets the tone... then let Chubba come in and get yardage off a wore down defense. It dont got to be harder than he making it. Chubba is a Captain and a real captain knows when to step aside while someone is hot. 

Edited by Lurk21
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TN05 said:

Rico Dowdle had 18 touches on Sunday, which is still a lot. For comparison, he had 26 in the Miami game and 34 in the Dallas game, and he was getting so many touches in the last one he was cramping hard. 

I'm by no means against giving him more touches than Chuba, he's earned it, but it's not like we didn't use him. 17 carries is as many as we gave Chuba when he started in the Atlanta game.

He came off the bench he should have been in the game from the start, he was coming off a historic 2 game run you ride that momentum and see what happens.

That rotating series b.s is just cute it's not how football is played and won.

Chuba can spell Rico but why force 50-50 split when the production isnt split?

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuba is a key leader on this team and he needs to give Chuba an opportunity to keep the starting job and this is the right way to handle this.  We can all see that Rico is a better back at the moment and he's going to win the starting job, but he needs to win if fair and square with both backs battling it out and not when a guy is injured.  Two backs going 110% to be the starter is a good thing.  

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canales trying to make things fair and even to keep the RB’s happy speaks to the type of coach he is. He’s known as a player’s coach and I guess his goal is to be liked by the players. 
 

That being said, I think the best coaches play who is performing the best regardless, and there shouldn’t be any guarantee that injury won’t prevent you from losing your starting job. 
 

 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jtm said:

Chuba is a key leader on this team and he needs to give Chuba an opportunity to keep the starting job and this is the right way to handle this.  We can all see that Rico is a better back at the moment and he's going to win the starting job, but he needs to win if fair and square with both backs battling it out and not when a guy is injured.  Two backs going 110% to be the starter is a good thing.  

Save the dramatics for the soap operas this is professional sports.

When Mile Sanders was the penciled starter I wanted Chuba who was outperforming him to get the bulk of the carries, now the script has been flipped.

On any other team who's sole purpose is to win Rico would have already earned the starting role. But on the teams that flounder more times than not it's front office and business decisions trump what's happening on the field. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jtm said:

Chuba is a key leader on this team and he needs to give Chuba an opportunity to keep the starting job and this is the right way to handle this.  We can all see that Rico is a better back at the moment and he's going to win the starting job, but he needs to win if fair and square with both backs battling it out and not when a guy is injured.  Two backs going 110% to be the starter is a good thing.  

I'm sorry I disagree. You don't risk losing a game to fulfill football politics. The amount of times yesterday Chuba had us in 2nd and long really hurt the team. And if not for the Jets being complete ass, we could have lost that game. At the very least, Dowdle should not be coming off the bench. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jtm said:

Chuba is a key leader on this team and he needs to give Chuba an opportunity to keep the starting job and this is the right way to handle this.  We can all see that Rico is a better back at the moment and he's going to win the starting job, but he needs to win if fair and square with both backs battling it out and not when a guy is injured.  Two backs going 110% to be the starter is a good thing.  

That's great if you don't care about winning.  If you do, you start the best players every time. If you don't want to lose your job because of injury, don't get injured.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...