Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young - High Ankle Sprain, out minimum 1 week


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Theres a line of thinking that long interceptions aren’t actually that bad anymore in the modern nfl. 

he also threw 33 touchdowns that year. 

If you look at the way the modern NFL has trended, it's dramatically away from TO prone gunslingers. There are also gunslingers in this era that are substantially less TO prone(Mahomes, Mayfield, etc).

Favre was in the old era. I have said that about Winston his entire career. He is just Brett Favre. Had he been a starter in that era, he would have been a beloved QB. 

Alas, different era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Certainly but the TO prone guys also tend to take the wind out of the sails of their teammates in pretty quick fashion.

Certainly wouldn't argue they will get many more chances, especially since we would be pretty far behind in most of our matchups. Not gonna argue against Winston's ability either. 

I don’t think the growth of these guys is likely getting as stunted as you assume. As stated above, the morale issue is likely going to weigh heavier on them than you think.

These guys aren't getting passes beyond 15 yards that are at a true NFL level quality of a throw, that's really not even debatable, it's just a fact with what Bryce is able (or not able) to do.

If you don't think that is stunting their growth, then I don't know what else to say, because it 100% is.

Even more so with someone like XL since he was so raw when we got him anyways.  Wasting 2 years of his development getting thrown balls that don't cut it at this level is without question stunting his growth.

You also forget that WRs tend to be the type that get happier when they're getting thrown the ball more, especially downfield.  So yes, while they might get frustrated by Jameis' turnovers, the increase in downfield passing will more than offset that to keep them happy.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Certainly but the TO prone guys also tend to take the wind out of the sails of their teammates in pretty quick fashion.

Certainly wouldn't argue they will get many more chances, especially since we would be pretty far behind in most of our matchups. Not gonna argue against Winston's ability either. 

I don’t think the growth of these guys is likely getting as stunted as you assume. As stated above, the morale issue is likely going to weigh heavier on them than you think.

I don't think there's much wind left in anyone's sails at this point.  If you don't get to play in a functional grown up passing offense, it's probably going to suck to play receiver.

I don't think morale is going to be as big of an issue if guys are catching shots downfield and scoring.  Even if we lose because our journeyman QB is terrible about throwing picks downfield.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I don't think there's much wind left in anyone's sails at this point.  If you don't get to play in a functional grown up passing offense, it's probably going to suck to play receiver.

I don't think morale is going to be as big of an issue if guys are catching shots downfield and scoring.  Even if we lose because our journeyman QB is terrible about throwing picks downfield.

Yeah, look at how frustrated AJ Brown was in Philly not getting the ball and they're 5-2 and have been one of the best teams in the league in recent years. Even if you're winning at some point if you feel like you're not being put in position to be your best individually then frustration is gonna start to show.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

These guys aren't getting passes beyond 15 yards that are at a true NFL level quality of a throw, that's really not even debatable, it's just a fact with what Bryce is able (or not able) to do.

If you don't think that is stunting their growth, then I don't know what else to say, because it 100% is.

Even more so with someone like XL since he was so raw when we got him anyways.  Wasting 2 years of his development getting thrown balls that don't cut it at this level is without question stunting his growth.

You also forget that WRs tend to be the type that get happier when they're getting thrown the ball more, especially downfield.  So yes, while they might get frustrated by Jameis' turnovers, the increase in downfield passing will more than offset that to keep them happy.

I don't think it's a stunting because if they have the abilities, they aren't magically going to lose them due to lack of game opportunities. Were that the case, backup players would be utterly useless as they just sit and watch.

XL's lack of development is solely of his own doing. 

I don't doubt that any WR is going to be happier with more opportunities but I also don't think Winston(or anyone else, for that matter) is suddenly going to transform our entire offense into 40-50 passes a game. I will say it's possible and given the player you are talking about that certainly might have to be an option more often than not but that doesn't really seem to fit Canales style in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

I don't doubt that any WR is going to be happier with more opportunities but I also don't think Winston(or anyone else, for that matter) is suddenly going to transform our entire offense into 40-50 passes a game. I will say it's possible and given the player you are talking about that certainly might have to be an option more often than not but that doesn't really seem to fit Canales style in general.

I don't think it's about passing 40-50 times a game.  I think it's about the times we do pass, we are threatening the whole field.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

DO NOT TRADE DRAFT CAPITAL FOR ANOTHER LAME DUCK QB. 
 

we need a franchise QB, not another average at best QB. Wait till the off—season and figure out the QB season. We just wanted an answer on Bryce this season and so far we’ve gotten that.

I agree with this and said as much in the "QB trade" thread last night.  However, I think Jameis is the one exception to this rule, especially if we can get him for a 5th or later pick TWO drafts from now.

To me, that cost is MORE than worth the return we'll get in the form of expediting the growth of our pass catchers.  

But literally any other available backup QB in the league and anything other than a pick TWO drafts from now, and I probably then balk at a trade like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I don't think there's much wind left in anyone's sails at this point.  If you don't get to play in a functional grown up passing offense, it's probably going to suck to play receiver.

I don't think morale is going to be as big of an issue if guys are catching shots downfield and scoring.  Even if we lose because our journeyman QB is terrible about throwing picks downfield.

I don't think morale appears to be bad, do you? If that were the case, how have we won four games?

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, look at how frustrated AJ Brown was in Philly not getting the ball and they're 5-2 and have been one of the best teams in the league in recent years. Even if you're winning at some point if you feel like you're not being put in position to be your best individually then frustration is gonna start to show.

Yeah, that's a little different scenario. He was also pissed last year too about not getting enough targets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Has anybody actually said anything of that sort? (if they did, I missed it) I get why some folks rely on stats. I don't, and honestly I'm not sure why people keep trying to convince me I should. (it ain't gonna happen) 😕 Consistency is my big thing too, and the lack of it is why I want to move on from Bryce. But again, that's an argument I make without denying that he can indeed play in (and yes, win) NFL games. Hating bad QB play is fine. Denying when you see good QB play is silly. Let's be real for a second... This may not be you specifically, but there are some folks for whom Bryce can do absolutely nothing to win their approval. Some are always gonna want a bigger / stronger / faster / more athletic (in some cases, Newtonesque) quarterback even if Bryce does start to play consistently. At that point, they'll just shift the argument from "we can't win with Bryce" to "well, we can't keep winning with Bryce" 😖 You know all this as well as I do. So again, I want to move on from Bryce as well. I'd happily (hell, merrily) keep him as a backup, but I doubt there's a realistic path to that happening. But no matter what, I'm gonna keep my debate points based in reality, and I'm not gonna be responsive to "he just sucks" level persuasion. Is any of that unreasonable? 🤔
    • Apples and oranges.   No one is coming for Jon Snow and the neutral party when they compliment Bruce when it is just normal talk about a game.  Which is the literal picture you are trying to paint above.  I mean that’s exactly what you argued. if you start a thread that is about the future of the franchise at QB going forward at QB and what we should do or are thinking! Yeah, the anti Bryce crowd is going to very vocal on that thread because the literal topic is extending Bryce and the future at QB (which is what an anti Bryce position is literally about.  Moving on.  The future) This thread? I literally called out people in their feelings wanting to make this about Bryce and their hurt feelings eroding over.  You can find where I literally calls them out go make another Bryce thread if they didn’t want to talk Saints and the most relevant thing about them.  And the thread went exactly as we all knew it would.   Bryce deserved player of the week talk for Atlanta.  I have always acknowledged his great games.  A shame there are only two 
    • Then the offense will be the same up and down underperforming offense they are this year and our FO are filled with idiots.
×
×
  • Create New...