Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you be willing to trade Chuba?


Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, t96 said:

I'm all for trading Chuba but I would not be expecting anything at all from Brooks in the NFL. View any contribution from him as purely a bonus cherry on top, but I would have different plan A, plan B and plan C at the position before Brooks if we trade Chuba, don't sign Rico, etc.

I would always keep RB on the radar in the mid to late rounds. My goal at RB is try to get as much production out of rookie contracts as possible and avoid paying them.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.

If they have assurance they can resign Rico

Chuba on the season has played in 6 games and has 282 yards that's 47 yards a game and that was the easy part of the schedule if you extrapolate that for the remaining 9 games that's 705 yards on the season. 

He's a good rotational back but if you can get some compensation via a trade then go for it.

Canales was out here handing out participation trophy in the National Football League and some fans were echoing it, "he wanted to give Chuba a chance to win his starting job back."

The way it works usually when a starter gets injured amd comes back he's giving the starting role back because it's assumed he's better than the backup filling in. There's no way based on Chuba's play before the injury and afterwards (Jets game) Canales or anyone else thought Chuba gave us the best chance to win against Buffalo whereas he got the most snaps and the most carries in the game. 

 

Edited by Pantherxtreme
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Captroop said:

Yes, with a decent line, almost any NFL caliber RB can be a 1,000 yard rusher. We've got talent waiting in the wings and it's a position we are pretty deep at this season.

I like Chuba, but I don't imagine I'd regret trading him while he had value. 

If you use this logic only half the teams in the NFL have a NFL caliber running back.. In 2023 12 RBs rushed for over 1000 yds, in 2024 there were 16. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, scratched said:

If you use this logic only half the teams in the NFL have a NFL caliber running back.. In 2023 12 RBs rushed for over 1000 yds, in 2024 there were 16. 

A RB now has to have 60 yards a game to get 1000 yards on the season. It's not as hard to get to anymore but a lot of teams are also doing RBBC so there aren't as many bell cow backs any more. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

doubt Morgan would trade one of the dawgs that he's building around.  And if it is a 4th, it will be a late one.  But we'd save over 20 mill on the cap which we could spend on Rico.

I wouldn't do the trade unless we work out a deal with Rico ahead of time, and on a similar contract with Chuba.  Incentive laden but still a reward for his accomplishments.  Our line will be healthy again next year, and we have that mystery back that we spend a second (!) on who may finally be healthy next year.  

   Too many signs point to no trade.  But I'd do it under those conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be open to trading Chuba but not for pennies on the dollar. 

The max we'd be offered is like a 4th or a 5th and that's not enough especially with the dead cap we'd have to eat if we did trade him. 

Chuba ran for 1200 yards last year and has been solid the years before that and I don't think we should just give him away for nothing. 

Now if a team like the Pats come forward with a real offer, I'd be open to listening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...