Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, strato said:

Off the top of my head I have one game that we were able to win by more than one score lol. 
edit: yeah that would get us to 7. Lol. 
hey it is nice to win however you do it. It’s just funny, a little. Like, we can’t get farther ahead of anybody than one score. So our wins, by default, are just gonna be one score wins. 

I understand the logic behind tracking that sort of thing, but it still strikes me as a double edged sword kind of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I understand the logic behind tracking that sort of thing, but it still strikes me as a double edged sword kind of thing.

This thing with the Panthers right now, seems to be a nature of the beast situation. We honestly cannot outscore people by more than one score.
One time out of 13. 

We can lose by more, no problem. We can keep it close and lose. We just don’t win big. Any time we win, almost, it is by just enough. 

It feels different to me than teams that have a particularly great year in one score games. Played a lot of them and won more than their share of them. And the next year can’t buy a tight win. (That seems to be the typical scenario) I don’t know why it just feels different than that. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's just not good enough. We need everything else to go perfect to win with Bryce. He got outplayed today by a 2nd round rookie. That was the biggest difference in the game today. Their QB was better than ours. Throwing at a 63% clip with a 6.8ypa average just isn't getting it done. Especially when the opponent throws at a 75% clip with an 8.5ypa average.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...