Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Basketball 2025


HeelsPanthersCanes
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
21 hours ago, Shocker said:

Tarheels pretty sloppy vs Navy tonight.  Duke gets Kansas with them missing maybe the player in college basketball.  Naturally 

I was worried about Navy, not beating us, but showing again that a team who is well coached and plays hard is going to give us fits.  Especially this early in the year. 

Let's see what happens vs St Bonnies, worried we will overlook them with Sparty two days later.  Not sure we'll stay within 20 points of Michigan State after seeing them play.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/19/2025 at 5:42 PM, Shocker said:

Yeah Mich St looks good.  Will be cool to see where we are after that game.

We learned Carolina is not tough inside, and if they are going to be dependent on the three, they better make them.  Got beat on rebounds, shot 13 more threes than Sparty, and still made less shots.  

I'm OK with the loss, as we weren't completely out-schemed or out-talented like we were all of last year.  But if this team doesn't watch the film and feel embarrassed about the lack of physicality and piss poor shooting, then we will get beat by double digits in Lexington.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/7/2025 at 6:41 PM, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

Have been pleasantly surprised with how good Veesaar has been this year. 

Equally as disappointed with how underwhelming Stephenson has been this year.

Wilson continues to be a beast. 

I think Dixon should be starting.  He is clearly the best option at the 1 right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...