Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Brugler’s panthers mock pick

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, strato said:

This will all change so much by the time the draft is upon us. 
Most interesting thing to me there is where he has us finishing. 

Dana forecasted number 15

1. Cleveland Browns (from TEN)*: Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana
 

2. Las Vegas Raiders (from NYG)*: Dante Moore, QB, Oregon

3. New Orleans Saints: Arvell Reese, edge/LB, Ohio State
 

4. New York Giants (from LV)*: Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State
 

5. Tennessee Titans (from CLE)*: Keldric Faulk, edge, Auburn
 

6. Washington Commanders: Rueben Bain Jr., edge, Miami
 

7. New York Jets: Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State
 

8. Arizona Cardinals: David Bailey, edge, Texas Tech
 

9. Los Angeles Rams (from ATL): Spencer Fano, OT, Utah
 

10. Cincinnati Bengals: Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State
 

11. Minnesota Vikings: Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame
 

12. Miami Dolphins: Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU
 

13. Kansas City Chiefs: Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon

14. Pittsburgh Steelers: Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama
 

15. Carolina Panthers: Peter Woods, DT, Clemson
 

16. Dallas Cowboys: Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee
 

17. Detroit Lions: Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Dana forecasted number 15

1. Cleveland Browns (from TEN)*: Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana
 

2. Las Vegas Raiders (from NYG)*: Dante Moore, QB, Oregon

3. New Orleans Saints: Arvell Reese, edge/LB, Ohio State
 

4. New York Giants (from LV)*: Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State
 

5. Tennessee Titans (from CLE)*: Keldric Faulk, edge, Auburn
 

6. Washington Commanders: Rueben Bain Jr., edge, Miami
 

7. New York Jets: Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State
 

8. Arizona Cardinals: David Bailey, edge, Texas Tech
 

9. Los Angeles Rams (from ATL): Spencer Fano, OT, Utah
 

10. Cincinnati Bengals: Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State
 

11. Minnesota Vikings: Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame
 

12. Miami Dolphins: Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU
 

13. Kansas City Chiefs: Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon

14. Pittsburgh Steelers: Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama
 

15. Carolina Panthers: Peter Woods, DT, Clemson
 

16. Dallas Cowboys: Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee
 

17. Detroit Lions: Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama

Browns go QB again? 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TD alt Grand Master

TD alt

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think need is always factored into the BPA equation. I mean, of course every team is always going to claim their draft pick was the BPA on their board. It's not like a team is ever going to admit that they passed on perceived better talent to take a player based on need but I think "BPA" really means "BPA for our team" and that factors in things like roster need, scheme fit, etc. that aren't necessarily related to pure talent level.

We took Luke when we had Jon Beason, and a hurt Jonathon Brooks when we had Chuba. Just noting. 

I don't think teams are going to pass up on an impact player regardlessly if whether they need something else. There's a good argument that drafting an inferior player, and especially an obviously inferior player, based upon need is a pathway to failure. 

I'm glad we took Tetairoa McMillan even though there were arguably bigger needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseCutStewart Grand Master

PleaseCutStewart

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

Dana forecasted number 15

1. Cleveland Browns (from TEN)*: Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana
 

2. Las Vegas Raiders (from NYG)*: Dante Moore, QB, Oregon

3. New Orleans Saints: Arvell Reese, edge/LB, Ohio State
 

4. New York Giants (from LV)*: Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State
 

5. Tennessee Titans (from CLE)*: Keldric Faulk, edge, Auburn
 

6. Washington Commanders: Rueben Bain Jr., edge, Miami
 

7. New York Jets: Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State
 

8. Arizona Cardinals: David Bailey, edge, Texas Tech
 

9. Los Angeles Rams (from ATL): Spencer Fano, OT, Utah
 

10. Cincinnati Bengals: Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State
 

11. Minnesota Vikings: Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame
 

12. Miami Dolphins: Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU
 

13. Kansas City Chiefs: Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon

14. Pittsburgh Steelers: Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama
 

15. Carolina Panthers: Peter Woods, DT, Clemson
 

16. Dallas Cowboys: Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee
 

17. Detroit Lions: Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama

I'll be surprised if Simpson falls that low. I think teams will like how quick he gets rid of the ball. There are enough QB desperate teams in the top 12 between Cleveland, Raiders, Jets, possibly Rams (Stafford is up there in age), and possibly the Vikings if they think JJ is Jamarcus Russell 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stuart Smith Veteran

Stuart Smith

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

We will finish outside the top 15. 

I saw one site had Cade Mays asking for 12-13 million a year and stating he might get that on the market. I do not see that. Austin Corbett is on a 3 million dollar a year contract. Decisions to be made here might affect how we draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Stuart Smith said:

I saw one site had Cade Mays asking for 12-13 million a year and stating he might get that on the market. I do not see that. Austin Corbett is on a 3 million dollar a year contract. Decisions to be made here might affect how we draft. 

If I had to choose between the 2 I would take Mayes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TD alt said:

We took Luke when we had Jon Beason, and a hurt Jonathon Brooks when we had Chuba. Just noting. 

I don't think teams are going to pass up on an impact player regardlessly if whether they need something else. There's a good argument that drafting an inferior player, and especially an obviously inferior player, based upon need is a pathway to failure. 

I'm glad we took Tetairoa McMillan even though there were arguably bigger needs.

Yeah and we took Shaq when we had TD and Butler when we had Star and KK. You'll take guys at positions of strength when you think they're by far and away the best talent available but you better be right when you do. Drafting a bust like Butler with a luxury pick at a position of strength is a real kick in the teeth 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      For starters, and again I am not sure what his capacity is in the media or how connected he is to the team, but I posted above Al Wallace says he is "absolutely" getting 50+ a year and he deserves it.  I obviously strongly disagree with it but it feels like like season when the team is slow leaking info to gauge the temp.   Secondly nobody on Gods green earth is going to sign an extension making less than he is making now.  Thats just crazy talk.  
    • LinvilleGorge
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • SmokinwithWilly
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
×
×
  • Create New...