First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

[Mr. Scot]

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, you are doing here what you do.  

but yeah, the people you are "addressing" here don't think as you want to portray them.   No one actually gives a fug about literal stats.  

threatening play and overall load carrying ability of an offense matter when it comes to a QB.  Especially, if your goal is to build a really good football team.  Thats generally the fixation of most teams.  Find tthat dude.   

Sometimes stats get talked about just because it is an easy way to talk on a message board about QBs that don't get what they are looking for and don't view as the answer. 

Funny how they keep quoting and basing their arguments on those things they "don't give a fug about".

Perhaps it is an "easy way" but I'm not about taking the easy way. My path is to look at what's good (without trying to minimize it or rationalizing my way out of it) then look at what's bad and make an honest call based on real truth.

Basically, it's like saying you'd rather play against a team at their best than hoping they're all banged up by the time you face them.

As to finding "that dude" you do so by finding who helps you win games.

Like it or not, Bryce is doing that right now.

[CRA]

34 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Funny how they keep quoting and basing their arguments on those things they "don't give a fug about".

Perhaps it is an "easy way" but I'm not about taking the easy way. My path is to look at what's good (without trying to minimize it or rationalizing my way out of it) then look at what's bad and make an honest call based on real truth.

Basically, it's like saying you'd rather play against a team at their best than hoping they're all banged up by the time you face them.

As to finding "that dude" you do so by finding who helps you win games.

Like it or not, Bryce is doing that right now.

It's a bantering message board.   I could do a performative dance that conveys what my eyes see if you want. 

you are fixated on this Mike Remmers "helped" us go 15-1 and have one of the best seasons ever so don't say he stinks and needs to be replaced angle. 

Bryce has been a key reason in why we lose games more so than being a key reason in why we win them.  If you want him to be warm body this year that might make a play here or there? Cool.   Us staying on the Bryce train makes us irrelevant in the big picture. 

[L-TownCat]

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

He handled our defense pretty well. 

He did have himself a day.  But was that him or our bi-weekly pant shitting appointment?

[Mr. Scot]

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

you are fixated on this Mike Remmers "helped" us go 15-1 and have one of the best seasons ever so don't say he stinks and needs to be replaced angle. 

Bryce has been a key reason in why we lose games more so than being a key reason in why we win them.  If you want him to be warm body this year that might make a play here or there? Cool.   Us staying on the Bryce train makes us irrelevant in the big picture. 

Wrong.

Mike Remmers did indeed help us to our best season ever (including having some very good performances) but he also still needed to be replaced based especially on how the season ended.

Those two statements are not mutually exclusive. They could be equally applied to other players, and this happens on an annual basis all over the league..

As far as Bryce, based on everything I'm reading what "I want" has become largely inconsequential.

All indications are that what I wrote that I expected after the Rams game (i.e. Bryce will get his fifth year option) is pretty much happening. Joe Person called it "an easy decision" at this point.

The future beyond that is, as the song goes, still unwritten.

But the near future looks to be fairly settled. 

Edited just now by Mr. Scot