Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Feelings on Bryce Through 3 Seasons? (POLL)


Hoenheim
 Share

Your belief in bryce through 3 years   

231 members have voted

  1. 1. How encouraged are you by bryce youngs performance thus far through 3 years

    • 10 Love him , franchise QB for the next decade
      2
    • 9 He's great but needs a tiny bit of polishing
      9
    • 8 He's very good
      15
    • 7 He's good, but not great.
      35
    • 6 he's decent maybe slightly above average
      54
    • 5 he's an average nfl qb that may be destined to be a backup caliber QB
      69
    • 4 he's bad, but he can be at least decent with a couple more years of experience
      13
    • 3 Not a good QB, probably can't be redeemed. But maybe he can be a project someone else can fix
      28
    • 1-2 Terrible, get him off my team, yesterday.
      6


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

The interception was on Coker if you ask me.  I feel he hesitated a bit on the route.  The fourth down failures are just as much on Canales as Young. 

There's always endless excuses.

Our UDFA WR had half our #1 overall QB's receiving yards.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Manna said:

I agree, but maybe if we set aside the hyperboles we were sold pre-draft, maybe some patience will pay off? 

No because we traded the world for him and crippled the franchise.

He's a replacement level player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's always endless excuses.

Our UDFA WR had half our #1 overall QB's receiving yards.

I'm not making excuses.  Coker is an amazing player, and we are nowhere near the playoffs without him.  My point is that not every bad thing that happens on the offensive side of the ball is Bryce Young's fault. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'm not making excuses.  Coker is an amazing player, and we are nowhere near the playoffs without him.  My point is that not every bad thing that happens on the offensive side of the ball is Bryce Young's fault. 

The safety was bearing down on that play.  Bryce shouldn't have thrown it.  He was late.  As usual. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'm not making excuses.  Coker is an amazing player, and we are nowhere near the playoffs without him.  My point is that not every bad thing that happens on the offensive side of the ball is Bryce Young's fault. 

https://x.com/thestevenruiz/status/2010390968303067564?s=46&t=sZBAMdzLph5zbmPd88saXg
 

heres breakdown on the play 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's always endless excuses.

Our UDFA WR had half our #1 overall QB's receiving yards.

Any coach or player here pretty much exists solely to become a convenient scapegoat whenever necessary in order to prop up Bryce Young.

If Bryce had that kind of juice it might be one thing. But he doesn't by any means. It's baffling.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

No because we traded the world for him and crippled the franchise.

He's a replacement level player.

For a #1 overall and everything we gave up, we should be going into his 4th season with no doubt at all that he is our QB and can put the team on his back and is the main reason why we win. None of that is true.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep, pretty much. Most of Bryce's good games are relatively disappointing games from actually good QBs.

I mean, we're all pretty happy that Bryce went 21/40 for 265 a TD and a pick. That's not a good game by good QB standards but it's a pleasantly surprising game for Bryce.

exactly also wonder how game would have been if the rams didnt have so many penalty yards also 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It may not be exact science and this FO is relatively new, but it is very much likely the first couple picks will be of players we met.
    • The only other position group I could think of is ILB since Dan was there for Rodriguez and Hill Jr. pro days in Texas. It’s one of the reasons I get the feeling ILB could be the pick at 19.
    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
×
×
  • Create New...