Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan open to bringing in younger QB to develop/compete for backup role


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Pavia is basically significantly less talented and much smaller Sam Darnold. He has even less QB experience than Darnold had. 

He is likely a long term developmental prospect and not really someone that could be relied on to be a quality #2 QB. He would be great as a #3 or PS QB to develop.

The swagger tho

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

There is no potential path for Chambliss to be a 1st round pick. He is a mid-round guy, at best.

I think a lot of fans are overlooking how completely terrible he was against Miami because Miami dropped all those gift wrapped INTs. He could've very easily gotten picked 4 or 5 times that game leading to an absolute blowout but evidently all the Miami defenders have bricks for hands. The NFL is gonna evaluate that game tape and see interceptions galore. We're not talking about "oh, that could've been picked" balls. We're talking about "how dafuq did that not get picked???" balls.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think a lot of fans are overlooking how completely terrible he was against Miami because Miami dropped all those gift wrapped INTs. He could've very easily gotten picked 4 or 5 times that game leading to an absolute blowout but evidently all the Miami defenders have bricks for hands. The NFL is gonna evaluate that game tape and see interceptions galore. We're not talking about "oh, that could've been picked" balls. We're talking about "how dafuq did that not get picked???" balls.

He has a ton of talent but he is another long term developmental guy. The idea that he is a first rounder is ludicrous.

Now, we have seen crazier QB picks so it COULD happen but the team making that choice should get roasted for the decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

We have none of these talents in our current QB room

He certainly is dominant physically. I doubt he is a match for Canales’ preferred play style. But if we took a day 3 flier I promise not to complain if he does nothing. 
Just keep taking those shots. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, strato said:

He certainly is dominant physically. I doubt he is a match for Canales’ preferred play style. But if we took a day 3 flier I promise not to complain if he does nothing. 
Just keep taking those shots. 

He's got all the tools, and a nice touch on medium passes where he doesn't need to smoke it. Canales is supposed to be the QB whisperer and this seems like all you can really ask for as someone to mold

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

He's got all the tools, and a nice touch on medium passes where he doesn't need to smoke it. Canales is supposed to be the QB whisperer and this seems like all you can really ask for as someone to mold

Yeah. And a good coach should be able to adapt to his players’ strengths and hide their weaknesses.

I feel like Canales wants to run more pocket and PA and the old school offensive style. Or rather, that is where his strength is. 

And you might think about trying to compliment a coach’s style when you acquire players. OTOH he should be able to grow and adapt as well. The guy looks good in those college games though. 
 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PanthersNCSU said:

Just feels like Allar is the type of guy we'd target, but after watching one Youtube highlight video of the Arkansas guy.....I miss that type of QB dynamism. 

I dont recall ever watching him play but after the highlight vids and his scouting report he seems like he is oozing with potential.  Rocket arm that is deadly on deep throws but not very good short/intermediate.  Seems like that could improve with scheme and coaching.  fug it get him in the 4rth

 

I really liked allar going into this year but man he was upside down most of the year.  It was a dysfunctional team for sure but he just didnt look good at all during the season.  I still like his skill set though

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...