Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is J-Stew a team propagandist?


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Well, I did admit "Homer" was a better word. "Propaganda," on its face is not hyperbolic in this sense, nor is it necessarily a negative word. Only due to fairly recent events is there a fully negative connotation (which I also alluded to), so I don't know what to tell you.

@LinvilleGorge or any mod feel free to change the term. Thanks.

Lol. Propoganda has been a charged word for well over 100 years. Are you a vampire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

J-Stew is an ex-panther who is a huge fan of the team and also on the pay role.  He also knows these guys personally.

Is it good marketing?  Propaganda? An opinion?  His argument in a court of law?

I think the real question is what the fug does it matter?

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TD alt said:

Well, I did admit "Homer" was a better word. "Propaganda," on its face is not hyperbolic in this sense, nor is it necessarily a negative word. Only due to fairly recent events is there a fully negative connotation (which I also alluded to), so I don't know what to tell you.

@LinvilleGorge or any mod feel free to change the term. Thanks.

I don’t know about the word itself, but people use propaganda as a tool through they can obtain political power. 
 

People that do propaganda suck.
 

 Stew is biased. He isn’t twisting facts lobbying and trying to fool people, he just has an opinion.  I would maybe call him a somewhat of a shill though, when he minimizes negatives to paint the organization in the most positive light he can.
 

He is being paid by the team. 
Also, he knows the players personally. 
You aren’t gonna get any controversial negatives out of him publicly.  

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Lol. Propoganda has been a charged word for well over 100 years. Are you a vampire?

Even if you're somewhat correct--not totally--it's still not hyperbole.

7 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

J-Stew is an ex-panther who is a huge fan of the team and also on the pay role.  He also knows these guys personally.

Is it good marketing?  Propaganda? An opinion?  His argument in a court of law?

I think the real question is what the fug does it matter?

I mean, why does any of this stuff matter? Just something to shoot the sh¡t about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Even if you're somewhat correct--not totally--it's still not hyperbole.

I mean, why does any of this stuff matter? Just something to shoot the sh¡t about.

Propaganda is the direct implication that this is he being used by the Panthers to spout a message.

This is a poor example of that, in my estimation. He is far more likely to just be a homer. This isn't abnormal behavior from him.

It's hyperbolic because you are spinning it as some greater thing from Panthers HQ, which is very likely is not. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Propaganda is the direct implication that this is he being used by the Panthers to spout a message.

This is a poor example of that, in my estimation. He is far more likely to just be a homer. This isn't abnormal behavior from him.

It's hyperbolic because you are spinning it as some greater thing from Panthers HQ, which is very likely is not. 

You realize that it doesn't have to come from the Panthers HQ to be spin? If you live and breath something---basically drink the Kool aid---espousing the company line can come natural.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TD alt said:

You realize that it doesn't have to come from the Panthers HQ to be spin? If you live and breath something---basically drink the Kool aid---espousing the company line can come natural.

I don't know if I've every heard someone use the word, "Propaganda" and not mean it in a negative context.  The same goes for phrases like "agents of the organization" or "drinking the kool-aid".

Even if you're not, it comes across as negative and insulting to Stew.  He's never been the type of person to be critical of individuals.  Just not his style.  Doesn't mean he's trying to pull a fast one, mislead you, or outright lying.

Should employees of the Panthers be objective when interacting with fans?  Is that even reasonable?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Loyalty4Life said:

I don't know if I've every heard someone use the word, "Propaganda" and not mean it in a negative context.  The same goes for phrases like "agents of the organization" or "drinking the kool-aid".

Even if you're not, it comes across as negative and insulting to Stew.  He's never been the type of person to be critical of individuals.  Just not his style.  Doesn't mean he's trying to pull a fast one, mislead you, or outright lying.

Should employees of the Panthers be objective when interacting with fans?  Is that even reasonable?

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Loyalty4Life said:

I don't know if I've every heard someone use the word, "Propaganda" and not mean it in a negative context.  The same goes for phrases like "agents of the organization" or "drinking the kool-aid".

Even if you're not, it comes across as negative and insulting to Stew.  He's never been the type of person to be critical of individuals.  Just not his style.  Doesn't mean he's trying to pull a fast one, mislead you, or outright lying.

Should employees of the Panthers be objective when interacting with fans?  Is that even reasonable?

Some of you are reading way too much into this. I've already said that "Homer" was a better choice of word. Agent of an organization is just that. Nothing inherently wrong with that. And, yes, Stew is obviously drinking the Kool-Aid. There's nothing inherently wrong with that. He loves his team even to the point of being a homer. There's nothing inherently wrong with that either. I said that I thought that it was way too early to declare Bryce the long term starter based upon his body of work, and that's what I meant. From what I've gathered from comments here, Stew has a Pollyanna attitude when it comes to the team. Noted. I'll just take that into account when he's discussing the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good grief, you'd think that I called the man a traitorous mole sent to infiltrate the fans and manipulate our minds by chicanery. 

This might be the last time I start a thread before the crack of dawn. I guess a I'll have to have my caffeine next time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He definitely skews positive but when things get very bad he actually points it out on the one podcast I watch with him and the media dude i forget the name of. They both got pretty upset when we lost to the saints both times iirc. 

Although the closest he's really ever gotten to criticizing bryce was "we can't really do anything about him as our qb" lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...