Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers - Potential cap casualties


Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Agreed. But, the cost to upgrade should be very small.

I am fine with upgrading on the cheap. I do not want to spend a day one or day two pick nor do I want to be in the Pitts FA sweepstakes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

He’s okay….but that’s still a pretty high cap number. He only had 2.5 sacks, and  was 35th in hurries. He’s good at batted passes at 3 which is 13th best but all his stats were basically down year over year. He’s still good at run defense, and I honestly think he’s a good locker room presence, and would be happy with a 1 year extension at a lower salary to level it out. I also would not be surprised if they decide they could use that 9.5 million to upgrade another position group, or use that money to help get a higher profile FA like a top tier LB, OLB, DE, or speed WR

IMG_0679.jpeg

Fidel Cashflow 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Day 1 or Day 2 elite guy, 100% fine. Do I think that is reasonable based on the class? No.

We have more important holes to fill than to be dropping pick 19 on a TE, I would be upset. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, strato said:

We have more important holes to fill than to be dropping pick 19 on a TE, I would be upset. 

If he's a game changer like Greg Olsen was for us it’s, a great idea. I'm with you though, I think the odds are much higher that we can get an impact LT, LB, or D-Line player that would fill a much larger hole than the three man rotation we have now in the TE room. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

If he's a game changer like Greg Olsen was for us it’s, a great idea. I'm with you though, I think the odds are much higher that we can get an impact LT, LB, or D-Line player that would fill a much larger hole than the three man rotation we have now in the TE room. 

Olsen was with Chicago 3 or 4 years and took a while to bloom. I remember wishing we could get him at 25 n 2007 but we took Beason. Couldn’t complain about that.
I would really love to get a Jon Beason level ILB this draft. 

38 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't care about position. Give me BPA.

We have 4-5 other positions that could really use some 1st round talent.  I feel like there will be someone at 19 at one of those positions with talent comparable to Sadiq. 
I am not gonna argue individuals really, I have done no research. Just philosophy. Address the holes unless it just isn’t close.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...