Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 5 draft targets for positions of need


Recommended Posts

Just now, NAS said:

JT Sanders has been such a disappointment.  I really thought he'd be good after his promising start to the rookie season. 

Ian Thomas looked promising his rookie season, too.   At this point I want a FA TE.  We have bigger fish to fry in the draft than taking a stab a another project TE, which isn't even a major component in this offense.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Ian Thomas looked promising his rookie season, too.   At this point I want a FA TE.  We have bigger fish to fry in the draft than taking a stab a another project TE, which isn't even a major component in this offense.

I wouldn't mind taking a shot at Kyle Pitts.  

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, NAS said:

I wouldn't mind taking a shot at Kyle Pitts.  

My dream FA splash signing. TMac, Coker, and Pitts would be a legit scary skill group for Bryce or whoever the next guy is. If Brooks comes back healthy to pair with Chubba, sheesh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Htarnation4.0 said:

We have to go heavy defense and throw some OL in the mix at some point. 

I'm consistently mocking OT, ILB, Edge, CB, and WR-(s).  Either a S or second Edge/ILB regularly. I'm starting to a C consistently to the mix now.

Depending on who is left at #19, I wouldn't mind moving back to get a another late 3rd or 4th rounder.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Okay, the way I understand the trade according to one article I read is the 7th got flipped to a 5th. so we gained a 5th and lost our 7th. Is that correct?

That should be correct. All the conditions for it to work in our favor played out 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

This team simply needs more blue chip talent which is why BPA is the only way to go. It’s the best way to sustain long term success 

We've still fuged up in the past going "BPA". We drafted Butler at DT and Shaq at LB when DT and LB were some of our biggest strengths of the roster. Butler was a flat out bust and Shaq was basically a JAG starter at LB. I know that triggers some folks, but sorry that's just the truth. We overdrafted him then doubled down on that and overpaid him.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

This team simply needs more blue chip talent which is why BPA is the only way to go. It’s the best way to sustain long term success 

In the past we had drafts that needed specific targets but given the current situation of mishandling those drafts you are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

Better option than drafting one right now.

Yeah probably. Not sure it is realistic, or not really risky. I mean we are counting on Bryce to unlock him. I have such a negative view of it that I think every guy we have at WR would do better with another QB. 
Except Thielen.  

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...