Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan: “We’ll explore signing Bradley Chubb”


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Honestly not that crazy. We spent big bucks on our 2 guards and he inherited a team from Fitterer that was completely void of talent at just about every position (while also not having picks because of trades by Fitterer). There are only so many picks we had and you can't fix every position group in a 2 year span

Not drafting oline on a regular basis is crazy.   It has five regular positions.  More than any other position and will make or break your team.  Morgan was in a tough position, but he made it worse with his first draft.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2026 at 9:16 AM, rebelrouser said:

Played w/ Evero in Denver in '22. This one makes sense if the price is right. Then go Oline, ILB, Oline in the draft.  Morgan has yet to draft an offensive lineman.  Crazy. 

The broncos traded him under Evero too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm for addressing edge in FA. We just drafted two in the 2nd round and they usually take a couple years of development. I don't think another rookie would provide much immediate help and might stretch our development resources thin. I'd rather look for bandaid vets while we continue to focus on developing the young talent already on the roster.

Thats my thought on it. There is long run and short run payoff to drafting. We already have a lot of draft capital tied up in the long run (the two 2nd rounders) but they take time to be plus starters. Bring in a guy that brings short term pop while the long run yield starts to mature. 

Fine with an edge later. 4th or 5th round. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Panthero said:

Thats my thought on it. There is long run and short run payoff to drafting. We already have a lot of draft capital tied up in the long run (the two 2nd rounders) but they take time to be plus starters. Bring in a guy that brings short term pop while the long run yield starts to mature. 

Fine with an edge later. 4th or 5th round. 

I was saying something similar. The drafted guys take time to develop. Unless you have a shot at someone like Julius Peppers, you are going to have to wait. Not exactly the same thing but for instance we got Charles Johnson in the 3rd, took him at least until his third season to start making difference. 
 

So get a guy that is ready now short term. A prove it year for an established edge would be ideal. Let him prove it, say thanks, let someone else pay him. Pad the position with another developmental guy later.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I wouldn’t read too much into [Dan] Morgan’s comments about [Bradley] Chubb, the fifth pick in 2018 who turns 30 this summer and is just two years removed from ACL surgery. Is Chubb a possibility for the Panthers? Sure. But the sense here is he’s not the top option."

- Joe Person, The Athletic 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...