Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why trading up in 2026 is a bad idea.


Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We have way too many needs to trade up. There will be good prospects available throughout that also fit a need. If you had a crystal ball that could predict future All-Pros and HOFers, sure. But there's no sure things in the draft. Great prospects bust every draft and some mid to late rounders end up being very good pros.

If you had a crystal ball you wouldn't even need your 1st round pick.  Crystal balls come in more handy for later round gems.  Imagine trading away a 1st for several 2nds and 3rds and picking up multiple all pros and HOFers instead of just one.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

We don't do well with first round trades. Up or down.

Just pick where we have it, take the best player we need and move on.

Then when the field gets a bit muddier, make your moves for the needed spots. 

There's going to be a huge run on WRs as always (over valued in my opinion), there are a ton of OTs and Edge is always heavy in the first and second rounds. Grab your future starting S and ILB in rounds one and two, snag your C in three. Take trade offers to move down in rounds three and beyond for a spot in the same round plus another, even if in a future draft.

We're going to have even more holes in our roster in 2027 than we do now. 

A LT is more crucial at this point than S or ILB.  LT must be addressed ahead of either of those two.  You won't find a LT in free agency worth a damn.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, panfanman said:

If you had a crystal ball you wouldn't even need your 1st round pick.  Crystal balls come in more handy for later round gems.  Imagine trading away a 1st for several 2nds and 3rds and picking up multiple all pros and HOFers instead of just one.

Yeah, for sure. If you had a crystal ball trading down to accumulate more picks to throw at sure things would almost always be the right move barring a HOFer being available who is going to be drafted in the next few picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Take the 19, make a smart pick for a foundational player.  38 and beyond, see what it's worth to people.

For me they either stay at 19 or make a small trade down into the mid 20s and snag an extra 2nd or something. They need to get an edge, linebacker or offensive tackle and I don’t think any other positions should really be on the table unless someone super elite fell to them 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, panfanman said:

A LT is more crucial at this point than S or ILB.  LT must be addressed ahead of either of those two.  You won't find a LT in free agency worth a damn.

Now while I agree, there's some stuff that can happen between now and the draft. We may know more about Icky's health. We may offer Njiman better than he's getting on the FA market if our coaches feel he can be a good stop gap or move laterally. There could be some trades happening.

Me, I'm hoping Icky can get better, although that's a tall order. 

Still, you are right and it should be LT, S and ILB. Those are the chessboard pieces we realistically need right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, hepcat said:

For me they either stay at 19 or make a small trade down into the mid 20s and snag an extra 2nd or something. They need to get an edge, linebacker or offensive tackle and I don’t think any other positions should really be on the table unless someone super elite fell to them 

If we move down five slots or less and pick up an additional 2nd? That would seal the deal for me.

That 2nd... hard to get someone on the back end of the round or early in the second to give that one up.

Still... if that miracle swap is there, take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

If we move down five slots or less and pick up an additional 2nd? That would seal the deal for me.

That 2nd... hard to get someone on the back end of the round or early in the second to give that one up.

Still... if that miracle swap is there, take it.

Eh you see someone at like 26-30 trade their late second round pick to move up to 19 and jump another rival playoff team for a player they love pretty regularly. Sometimes you can even get a future first out of those trade ups depending on how desperate they are to move up. Not crazy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Eh you see someone at like 26-30 trade their late second round pick to move up to 19 and jump another rival playoff team for a player they love pretty regularly. Sometimes you can even get a future first out of those trade ups depending on how desperate they are to move up. Not crazy. 

I would love that. We may need to be pretty serious about next year’s 1st round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except for WR and maybe OT, the draft is largely a crapshoot. The dropoff from Styles to Anthony Hill Jr. might seem like a lot now, but end up being not at all or Hill may be even better. So just stay, and take BPA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

Except for WR and maybe OT, the draft is largely a crapshoot. The dropoff from Styles to Anthony Hill Jr. might seem like a lot now, but end up being not at all or Hill may be even better. So just stay, and take BPA

I wouldn’t mind Hill at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2026 at 4:01 PM, panfanman said:

A LT is more crucial at this point than S or ILB.  LT must be addressed ahead of either of those two.  You won't find a LT in free agency worth a damn.

LT has to be the pick at 19. We hopefully will have the choice of Freeling(who I prefer), Lomu, and Proctor.  With Ickeys injury, we can only hope that he is able to come back in 27 and be the replacement at RT for Moton. Thats best case scenario IMO. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...