Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maxx Cosby deal with Ravens off.


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, countryboi said:

these agents are only as good as their connections, they wouldnt burn an entire team for a few more dollars at least not like that

At the end of the day it’s the player’s choice

but I don’t see it going that route

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Said it in the general thread, if this poo collapses we go get Crosby. 
Raiders might have to release him. People have made their moves. 
 

Here we are. Go get him, for less than Phillips because we would have all the leverage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

They knew before they agreed to the trade that he had just had surgery and still agreed to it.

A torn meniscus is far from a career threatening injury. It's pretty clear they got cold feet and used the "failed physical" as an excuse.

There are different levels of menicus surgery and he had one with a longer recovery time than originally thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ravens are scummy for pulling a move like this. The "failed physical" story is just some save face BS and the whole league knows it. The whole NFL knew Crosby just had a knee procedure done and you felt comfortable enough a couple days ago to send 2 first for the guy. This implies that the Raiders withheld medical information from them which I highly doubt they did especially with 2 first being on the table. Are the Ravens expecting us to believe that they gave the Raiders 2 first without having Crosbys full medical records? 

They saw that Trey Hendrickson's market wasn't as active as they thought so they deiced to work on a deal with him instead and save their 2 first. If I'm the Raiders GM, I'd be absolutely livid right know cause not only did they mess up the contact situation with the free agents the Raiders have agreed to terms with, but you've severely hurt the market for Max Crosby by "failing" him on a physical. 

The Ravens had buyer's remorse and decided to screw the Raiders

Edited by CmC2k
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

The Ravens are scummy for pulling a move like this. The "failed physical" story is just some save face BS and the whole league knows it. The whole NFL knew Crosby just had a knee procedure done and you felt comfortable enough a couple days ago to send 2 first for the guy. This implies that the Raiders withheld medical information from them which I highly doubt they did especially with 2 first being on the table. Are the Ravens expecting us to believe that they gave the Raiders 2 first without having Crosbys full medical records? 

They saw that Trey Hendrickson's market wasn't as active as they thought so they deiced to work on a deal with him instead and save their 2 first. If I'm the Raiders GM, I'd be absolutely livid right know cause not only did they mess up the contact situation with the free agents the Raiders have agreed to terms with, but you've severely hurt the market for Max Crosby by "failing" him on a physical. 

Hard to say the Ravens did dirty until Crosby actually returns to play. Brooks was supposed to be healthy too and went months past his anticipated return date. If Crosby hasn't progressed as much as projected, it could definitely create cold feet. Like I said, no one will really know until he actually returns to the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

The Ravens are scummy for pulling a move like this. The "failed physical" story is just some save face BS and the whole league knows it. The whole NFL knew Crosby just had a knee procedure done and you felt comfortable enough a couple days ago to send 2 first for the guy. This implies that the Raiders withheld medical information from them which I highly doubt they did especially with 2 first being on the table. Are the Ravens expecting us to believe that they gave the Raiders 2 first without having Crosbys full medical records? 

They saw that Trey Hendrickson's market wasn't as active as they thought so they deiced to work on a deal with him instead and save their 2 first. If I'm the Raiders GM, I'd be absolutely livid right know cause not only did they mess up the contact situation with the free agents the Raiders have agreed to terms with, but you've severely hurt the market for Max Crosby by "failing" him on a physical. 

The Ravens had buyer's remorse and decided to screw the Raiders

Reminds me of the Lakers doing this exact thing to the Hornets last season.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, countryboi said:

thats the sad part they are getting fuged in this because Maxx is worth less now

They better hope there's a bidding war for him. It could cause them to have to back out of some of their own deals. I can't say as I've ever seen a situation like this before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Hard to say the Ravens did dirty until Crosby actually returns to play. Brooks was supposed to be healthy too and went months past his anticipated return date. If Crosby hasn't progressed as much as projected, it could definitely create cold feet. Like I said, no one will really know until he actually returns to the field. 

Yea I’m not gonna pass judgement. “Failed physical” is a misnomer. There’s no such thing as a failed physical. The Ravens checked out his knee and got his medical records and said nah, the risk isn’t worth two first round picks and his massive salary at his age 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Yea I’m not gonna pass judgement. “Failed physical” is a misnomer. There’s no such thing as a failed physical. The Ravens checked out his knee and got his medical records and said nah, the risk isn’t worth two first round picks and his massive salary at his age 

This is exactly what happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...