Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Chubba on the Trading Block?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I can't see that happening.  Too many IFs in the RB room.  Hubbard is about the only RB we can count on as of now.   If we destroy our RB room there is no way Young will succeed.  We cannot become a throw first to open the running game. 

Bad Idea. 

Which is terrible, 1 QB and 2 first round WRs in the last three drafts and we still have to be a run first team.

Am I the only one that sees a problem with this?

Also no one is checking for Hubbard, you can get that quality of back later in the draft, he's not a game changer.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Which is terrible, 1 QB and 2 first round WRs in the last three drafts and we still have to be a run first team.

Am I the only one that sees a problem with this?

Also no one is checking for Hubbard, you can get that quality of back later in the draft, he's not a game changer.

We have talked ourselves blue in the face about the problem with it for three years now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

Which is terrible, 1 QB and 2 first round WRs in the last three drafts and we still have to be a run first team.

Am I the only one that sees a problem with this?

Also no one is checking for Hubbard, you can get that quality of back later in the draft, he's not a game changer.

That is a huge gamble.  You cannot be 100% certain that you are going to get a solid running back to replace Hubbard.  You can think we can get a replacement in the draft you however you would be going into the season with a 30+ YO RB, a running back who has had 2 ACL tears in the same leg and a 2nd yr RB with limited success and a rookie you hope can replace Hubbard.  

You are taking a serious gamble for a run first offense.  

Hubbard won't be traded.  It makes zero sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

That is a huge gamble.  You cannot be 100% certain that you are going to get a solid running back to replace Hubbard.  You can think we can get a replacement in the draft you however you would be going into the season with a 30+ YO RB, a running back who has had 2 ACL tears in the same leg and a 2nd yr RB with limited success and a rookie you hope can replace Hubbard.  

You are taking a serious gamble for a run first offense.  

Hubbard won't be traded.  It makes zero sense. 

yea hes not going to be traded...coming off a down year, his panther value is not what his league value would be.

Im not sure we could trade him even if we wanted to, not for anything worthwhile anyway. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
    • This is a toughie because I wonder what a guy like Canales thinks about redemption stories for addiction issues. Also, I think this is a case of 1 player getting caught, and not being naive enough to think this isn't more common in college than we think. I'd toss a 3rd rounder out there. 2026 is essentially a redshirt season regardless, so he's not taking over for any NFL QB next year. Best case, he's ready to go in 2027 if we pass on Bryce's extension. Worst case, he's our future backup QB2. Kid has the tools to be an NFL QB. I do think we could somehow land a '26 3rd round pick back in a trade. Our past years' third rounders are: Brazzell Princely Wallace DJ Johnson Matt Corral All this to say, I could see a team like the Jets going w/ a 2nd. They have three FRPs next year.
    • Alright man! We're here for it! Just glad you're keeping the doors open!
×
×
  • Create New...