Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the Bills were to move to Toronto...what would be a good name?


panthersphan

Recommended Posts

My buddy flew down from Toronto for the Monday night game this past week and we were talking about potentially having a team in Toronto...he goes to university with the son of one of the main guys in charge of pushing for relocation. He said it's almost certain it'll happen, 90%, all they need to do is "cross the t's and dot the i's"

So, what should they be called? In all honesty...I know we'll get the "Maple Syrups", or the "Beavers", or what not...

how about...

Toronto Huskies (isn't intimidating, but it fits nicely)

Toronto Towers (CN Tower, lineman=towers, etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bills won't be leaving Buffalo. They love their bills unlike Houston and the Oilers.

tell that to Browns fans, or Dodgers, or Giants, or Colts, or Northstars, or Nordiques. I'm not saying they won't get another team eventually..but I could see it happening. TO has been pushing for NFL since the 70s and with nearly 7 million in the market (4th largest in North America) supporting it would not be the problem.

I wouldn't be surprised if they stayed, but from what everyone is saying they are as good as gone...my uncle calls me almost weekly to talk about the bills and such...but w/ Goodell being from upstate, he'd push to keep them there...but in the end, $$$ talks.

What proof do you have, at all, that they will stay? Buffalonians would sure like to hear it!

You could of at least gave a name ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...