Either no comment or what PhillyB said above should have been the only response. I'm not saying it's an enviable situation Baker was put into, but at that point there's no winning anything really so damage control all around in his position was the safest route.
I have not. Pouncey's action does not equal Garrett's action when being discussed in the lens of corresponding consequences. You can speak all the ethics you want and lambaste widely accepted judicial principles, but that doesn't change the current reality.