Panthero

They were pretty harmless.

Great stuff. Until Caleb hits, they aren't gonna be able to crow about any picks. The league begins and ends with QB which is why I don't mind us swinging for a qb. I wish we'd have gone after Stroud, but making the move we did for QB was, is and always will be the right move.

Oh boy. While I love the back talk, what do Cs mean then? Besides what they actually mean?

Yeah, true, but im trying to be an asshole about it.

Damn that is one big mammer jammer. Love it. Guess he's the backup NT now.

Didn't know washington had any NIL money to throw around. Guess it makes sense, given their history, but still surprised me.

you are arguing a different point than I am. Took me a minute to figure that out so we're cool. Still gonna bust your balls though......cause you're wrong.

Dang it. This guy isn't falling for the bait either!

I checked with every other position. Wanna know the only position with less representation in the first round? Kickers and Punters, with safety being close. Lol.

Shut up, nerd.

Honestly these grades are laughable. C is an average grade. Meaning it should be the most common, at least over time. Not everyone is above average, otherwise that's a new average! Bunch a grade inflation bs if you ask me.

Go ahead, then divide by all the RBs drafted and tell me what the percentage is. Spoiler: it's extremely low, which is my point. Picking individual data points does not change the probability of being drafted in the first round vs all drafted runningbacks. Your argument = some great RBs in the first round, ok fair. My argument = some great RBs in the first round ÷ all running backs in all rounds. My number is much smaller. That's what sets the typical price for RBs, not the outliers at the top.

It's not about disagreeing. Your position is factually incorrect. Driven in large part by a pass happy league. Taking one or two data points doesn't refute the rule.

"Different reasons". Positional value is realized in the market. Either there isn't much demand or there's too much supply. In either event, most runningbacks (other than maybe two or three in the entire league) are not prioritized.

I feel the Scrotum grade is too low. B and the Manleyman grade too high, B-.

Hes doing pretty good EXCEPT for the damn 2nd round last year!!!

Taking an injured guy at a position that is neither a need or has much positional value is dumb. Why are you trying to argue this? It's a bad position. Showing me up for being negative isn't worth taking a bad angle.

That's why it came to me. A good draft is not expected from people who do dumb poo like last year. Glad you could set me straight, scrow.

I know. Just grinds my gears.

Seems like nfl GMs should quit trying to "outthink" everyone. Right now looks like an absolute lost pick. Could have a rookie starting center or middle linebacker instead of a dude with a bum fuging leg collecting a check.....and doing fuging nothing

Any Middle LBers left?