Jump to content

flagfootballcoach28

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    1,092
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

4,521 profile views

flagfootballcoach28's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • One Year In Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

932

Reputation

  1. I love Tyson. I think he will be fantastic, but would we really pay 3 young WR’s 2nd big money contracts down the road? Seems like a poor allocation of resources in a salary cap word if we plan on keeping TMac and Coker long term.
  2. Obviously BPA is not 100% bulletproof. Even professional card counters still lose at times. Over a long duration though, it’ll give you better draft classes. Butler was only Gettleman’s BPA. Noone else had him rated that high.
  3. This team simply needs more blue chip talent which is why BPA is the only way to go. It’s the best way to sustain long term success
  4. This is the way. He’s no Luke, but who is? Golday is one of my draft crushes. I’d love him in the 2nd.
  5. Go watch him on that long TD run by the Miami RB. Yikes.
  6. Screw it, I'll go against the grain and play devils advocate. We tried the committee approach with Turk Wharton and Bobby Brown at DT instead of just paying a little extra for the blue chip player Milton Williams last offseason..That was a mistake. If we pass on Trey, we'll most likely do the same again.. overpay for JAG's who don't move the needle(Wonnum, Jones, Wharton, Brown). If we like it or not, there's a high chance we are going to have BY for another few years bare minimum. Might as well just accept it, use that extra cap space to build a good team around him like other franchises do with their rookie contract QB, then see what happens. A projected 2 year 50 mill deal for a player who's 1 year removed as the sack leader is not the worst outcome. Plus, that would take pressure off our young edge guys to carry the workload.. Tre played in 7 games last year, still had 4 sacks. Around a 10 sack rate if he plays the entire season. Still better than anyone we have. He was also playing hurt before he finally called it quits for the season. I get that he's 31, but a guy who heavily relies on hand usage, technique etc more than athleticism should still be productive as he ages a little. It's a strong LB class. It would allow us to address LB, OT, with our 1st and 2nd round picks while giving us another year to evaluate Scourton and Princely before we jump the gun on another edge.
  7. I assume you’re talking about Proctor and Lomu. I consider them overrated and both risky prospects, but we’ll see what happens. I feel like the value in the 2nd round at OT is way better “bang for your buck” than the late 1st round guys.
  8. At 19, it's hard to imagine OT being even close to BPA. I'd rather just draft BPA and figure LT out another way even though it's not ideal. We simply need more blue chip talent.
  9. Many other coaches would. 11 total coaches have interviewed, Mike McDaniels will make it 12. #1 pick, a lot of cap space, pay raise, no state income tax, warm city. People say this crap every year about teams, yet it never turns out to be true.
  10. Should've just resigned Burns after not accepting the 2 first rounders. He is one of the better "bang for your buck" pass rushers in the league. His contract aged well. Now, we'll keep drafting edge rushers in hopes they produce like Brian Burns when we could've used those picks on other positions.
  11. Tank as in not trade up for Bryce Young and stay put at 9, keep next years pick which ended at #1 (aka Bears taking Caleb Williams) We were so bad that year without even trying to tank.
×
×
  • Create New...