rayzor

Yes. Thursday night is a bad thing for the players. Bit then profit > people, right?

I have no doubt we're going to be making a serious push for Armstead. Stealing him from the saints will be sweeter than taking Gilmore out from under the bucs noses.

Positions are for paper.....at least in this defense. On the field and in the mind of (Phil) Snow, it's VERY fluid.

Yes

$2 and we got a deal.

Which one?

If they don't like it, they should play better so he doesn't want to

What deals for OL have we not been in on? What deals for OL have been going on? Teams don't trade OL, especially decent ones. They don't let them go the way they do other positions. It's going to be near impossible to trade for one or find one worth having hitting the market. And if you do find one....it's gonna cost much more than almost any other position.

Sam does have his issues in the third, buy it's a whole team effort... or lack thereof in the third. They come out in the 2nd half flat on both sides of the ball. I don't know what they do in that locker room during the half, but it isn't filling them with a sense of urgency. It's almost like they take a nap during halftime and use the 3rd to wake up. All other quarters they are damn solid. It's just coming out of that half that they sleep walk. Overcoming that is going ng to be the thing that makes them a championship team, even with a bad OL.

Suuuuuurre......

Hes taking advantage of what the defense is giving him and he's doing it in a very effective and efficient manner that eliminates chances for turnovers and it's all part of the scheme. Brady gives him choices and if one of the choices allows you to walk into the end zone, you walk. You don't not walk into the end zone because "I'm a QB and I should be throwing the ball in". How epically STUPID would that be? It's just like if you had some monster RB who could run the ball in effectively and consistently and you kept going to him instead of choosing to throw. Would the QB be considered less effective at his job if he went to the RB consistently? Oye .....

The job of the OC and QB is to get us downfield and into the endzone. Doesn't matter how it happens as long as it does.

"Breakdown of the O-line"..... The recurring theme of the year.

I put bad fan in quotes. I don't get to decide who is or isn't a bad fan. I may not like what you said (which is my right just as it is you're right to say it) and it was the "I told you so" attitude that pissed me off, but it's not bannable. None of it is.

It's tolerable to a point before the game...after the game not so much. That's why I gave most of them the boot. They beat us, they get a little freedom to gloat, but not for long. Them being around to talk trash before the game and a little after is totally fine and pretty fun as long as they don't break the rules.

Yes, starters on the OL don't need to be versatile, they just need to be REALLY good at their specific position. Backups should be versatile and need to be, until they are good enough at one job to take the starting role at that position over as their own.

Just because I have power doesn't mean it should be used much. I'm not going to ban people just because they have unpopular opinions or don't show their fanhood the way I would or just because they are turds. Spamming and constant trolling or too many insults (outside of the tinderbox) are the primary reasons. Not for being a "bad fan".

Seriously what metrics are they using for OL?

Yep. You're a sad little prick.

They beat.... Atlanta. Atlanta.

So do I. Then next year we will be dominant (provided we get our collective heads out of our arses and actually fix the OL with players who are good at the job rather than guys whose qualifications are they can play several spots on the line).