jayflip

1 minute ago, shaq said:

You could make that argument for anyone except Baker, preseason means a bit but having a playoff win under your belt is a really good sign. Zappe is slinging it out there but this is against 3rd and 4th stringers.

Lol you know who you are trying to reason with, right?

I love the huddle

Oh poo my words of wisdom went to page 2. 
 

Squabble away then, brothers and sisters. 

Obligatory reminder:

We’re prolly not playing many or any starters. 
 

Patriots will be, prolly. 
 

Matt Rhule openly stated he thinks the reps in joint practice (simulated game situations) are more important than a vanilla preseason recital, so take that for what it’s worth. 
 

They value the glorified joint practice more than this glorified dress rehearsal. Don’t expect anything from tonight’s performance except for some flash plays from some depth pieces here and there. 

54 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

i thought i would get pie but i got quotes instead.  

 

my plan backfired

Now you actually have to do it. godspeed, thehuddler, godspeed. 

It’s crazy that Calvin got a whole season for a negligible bet. 

What are the NFL rules restricting number of games you can wear the alternate helmets??

 Would be super rad if CAR rolled out the all black vs CIN all white in week 9

6 hours ago, DMathematics said:

Guess you guys didn't catch the sarcasm lol  

Who are you again?

1 minute ago, onmyown said:

The NFL has basically came out and established their rules:

1. Don’t be a white man and make offensive comments.

2. Don’t mess with their money.

3. Whatever a certain group of people are mad about that particular week on the news, don’t be a part of. (expires in 3 months)

Everything else under the sun is 100% fair game.

Your white fragility is showing 

Jesus y’all are miserable. Imma hope this momentum and hype continues!

17 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Newton ran a Zone Read offense, not an RPO.

There are similarities, but they're not the same thing. RPOs have emerged more recently while use of the zone read has been significantly reduced  (at the pro level, at least).

Those of us who haven't been banned a dozen times or more by them might feel differently.

I have never caught a ban hammer (yet) and consider myself one of the more level posters here but sheesh. CRA is aight mostly but LG is a tired trope right about now. 

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Sam Darnold or iamhubby1? Neither seems like they would be a pleasant hang.

I’d pound beers at a tailgate with them 14/10 times before LG or CRA

All these evals woulda been leaked a bit ago. Anything leaked on draft week is nothing but ECats & Pink Flaps. 

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's always either "there's no QB worth drafting" or "all the QBs will be gone before we pick". According to the Huddle it's never the right time to draft a QB.

I’m firmly in the draft a high upside QB and swing for the fences camp. Willis all day. Even if it’s somehow Willis, Icky and Neal available when we’re picking. 

Prior post regarding Joe Thomas and the browns was spot fuging on. 
 

1 hour ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Did you read his post? This is what he said. "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap." 

 

We used a 2nd, and a 3rd on Offense. But I guess those 2 picks don't count. lol

 

How can we have 5 Offensive Draft picks, and at least 3 quality FA, while spending all our draft capital on D, and trash bin diving?

 

You folks kill me. Make up a fact, and expect to get away with it.

I agree with you and it’s fascinating. But be careful, LG nuked (not banned, but nuked) GJBC’s account and posting history and all threads he started because his fee fees got hurt. 

What were his assessments of last year’s crop? Real question, are they available? Would be cool to see his write ups on the Lamar class, the Murray class. Kalil the younger. Fischer. Cam, even. 

31 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Fitt just admitted in his last presser that they didn't bring in Russell Wilson when he was in Seattle so people would think they weren't interested

Smoke screen the smoke screen. I like it. 

I hope we draft Willis primarily for the god awful huddle takes from the good ol boys club. NGL. 

3 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:

I think they shouldn’t, I will say it again he’s not that great. He should’ve never made pro bowl, Reddick should have. No way Burns should make the money Reddick is making, I was hoping we could trade him.

I suddenly remember why I confuse you with Sizzle

LSD is my second favorite drug. 

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

His nature. People are either calm, cool, and collected in pressure situations or they're not. I firmly believe that isn't a coachable trait. You have it or you don't.

 

You either approach things with aplomb or you don’t. You can’t teach it, but you can lose it, and if you lose it it’s damn hard to gain it back. 

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Does anybody know wtf is going on?? And why this is even a topic.....

No, but thread summary to save your time:

- Zod whispers sweet nothings into our ear 

- Doom and gloomers flip out

- LG does LG things (yawn)

- Jon Snow still knows nothing

Thomas Fletcher and Darnold for some team’s 7 rounder in 2025

How you gonna spell out period but really end with exclamation marks?

18 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Steelers love Willis according to lots of draft Twitter I've seen. If they wanna move up ahead of, say, Atlanta, I'd absolutely trade down with them to get more picks to fix this roster. Especially if they're offering maybe their second this year and a first or second next year, which they might need to to move up from 20 to 6. 

If they traded up that far for Willis while giving us picks, I'd be down for drafting Pickett or Corrall at 20 at that point. Other than that I still think the best bet is passing on this class and thinking long term. 

Think of what the 49ers gave up to move from 12 to 3 to pick the 3rd QB of the draft. We can dream bigger, brother.