Mr. Herbert

Or we could take the worst qb in the nfl. Whoops. To late 

Just now, WOW!! said:

Most mocks don’t know what Denver, Washington, Chicago, or New England are willing to do to hope over us... Not to mention what Atl, or Detroit is willing to take to screw us...

My advice to you would be to bet Vegas. 85% that one of the two lasts. Guess you've won.

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I don’t know what the fug you’re reading but it doesn’t seem to be helping you read the landscape correctly.. Sorry for you..

And it's ok. Noone asked you to be smart. I do like your nonsense though.

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I don’t know what the fug you’re reading but it doesn’t seem to be helping you read the landscape correctly.. Sorry for you..

Most Mocks now have one or the other if not both falling to us. Seen anything on Mac to SF. You are proving yourself dense.

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

And I'm telling you that's not guaranteed at all now.. And waiting on it to happen is fuging stupid... You obviously don't see what's going on the last few weeks and don't  see the FO has been in conversation and can see that the landscape isn't going there way... And even if Field or Lance drop that still is the same ? mark at QB.. So you're either waiting to take the same risk or taking the risk now while adding a 1st round talent at another needed position... 

I like this plan better..

Moving on now.. have a nice day..

I only read about it 14 hours per day. That's why I'm saying that one will be there .I  Just hope were both wrong and take Fields at 8!  Seems like a far cry now but dont believe everything that's said.

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

You're the pot calling the kettle black .. Since Teddy didn't work this won't work so why even try..

Let's just sit all draft night and not read the room and hope we get a chance at the 5th best QB in this draft... 

Great idea . Reactive not proactive has also worked...lol

 

I'll tell you one thing, either Lance or Fields will be there at 8. You look back and ask yourself was the worst qb in the nfl (statistically) worth not taking the risk on a rookie? You are 100% rah rah club. I'm not buying.

Mr. Completely is completely  full of shiit.

Speak up shiitt boy!

More interceptions than touchdowns. Who else can even say that?

I'm not a Cam apologist but I'd take him anyday and twice on Sundays versus this clown! Maybe you just see value that I dont.

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

We also gambled on drafting QBS and failed should we stop doing it??

Isnt that the pot calling the kettle black. We should take one this year at 8. Not settle for the worst qb in the nfl!

Give me a metric where he is not almost last in the league. That's not changing.

Turddlers love this deal. They tend to forget that he absolutely sucks!

Rah rah is not for me. Be competent or

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

That's where we differ... 

You are willing to gamble that the 5 best QB in this draft drops to us..

I'd rather take the calculated risk that if we believe in our coaching we can make the best talent in a draft a few years ago better.. While building the rest of the team and keeping our assets..

Fair enough. The same buffoons who gambled on Teddy and our armchair GMs including myself said it was a colossal  mistake.

20 hours ago, Zod said:

Hey there, just a heads up.

 

I'm going to be annoyingly optimistic about Sam just as I was with Teddy because it is way more fun and life is too short to be a constant sour puss. 

 

Sorry, not sorry.

 

Love,

 

Your Ruler 

 

 

 

Well friend that only makes you as dumb as the average huddler. Cheer on!

Homer's are gonna home. Terrible move and we will suck for another 5 years. Mean while I can barely make the toilet these days. Hope you 20s hipsters get your SuperBowl. I'll be farting in my grave. This team sucks!

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Bro you're not guaranteed that at all now. 

Please for 2 seconds take a look at the surrounding circumstances that the team was looking at before this move... 2 seconds..

3 QBS gone after the 1st 3 picks that is reality now...  ...

Atlanta isn't helping us at fuging all.. Either they pick a QB  or trade with another team that wants a QB.  So that's 4 gone in the top 4 picks...

So now the panthers are sweating the next 3 picks or getting fleeced of assets for the 5th QB in this draft..

How is that a smart position to be in???

 

You're thoughts are real but Is bet sweet odds one will be there and whether we like him or not, I bet hes better than the 32nd best qb.

2 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

yes

2 minutes ago, CardiacCat said:

hit the bottle early today.....?

 

I did. So dont mind my rants. Sam Dardnold is ugly and not good at football!

Rah,  rah team! Was gonna make it rhyme, nevermind we suck and always will!

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

You call it outmaneuvered.. But reality is how many of you arm chair GM think it's really a smart move to give up 2 to 3 years of 1st round picks and some 2nd rounders for the 3rd best QB in this draft.. "FOR THIS TEAM" San Francisco is a different situation with not much needs.. That is not us... If that's a great move for us for you ....smh... okay ...

Not for me... I'd rather give up very small compensation take a calculated risk and still have as much of my assets the next couple years to make moves if 

2 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

What if we gave up 5 1st founders for Watson before the sexual assault stuff came out, 

 

Bros we were getting Lanc or Fields! Now were getting the 32nd best qb in football. You guys may want to marinade on that.

That's my quarter back! Oh well.

Welp I'd say, we got Sammy mutha fuggin Darnold and then I'd convince to killing myself.