Jump to content

Mr. Herbert

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mr. Herbert

  1. I think I just want Jones to be worth the hype. I know pro days mean very little but the difference from Wilson to Jones was eye opening. The tanlent gap looked stark. I think huddlers including myself are just shell shocked after watching a qb refuse to throw the ball down field when there wasnt another option. Not sure if that's fair to Mac but not sure if I care either.

    • Beer 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

    I will be happy with BPA. I honestly don't want us to settle and reach for a QB that we truly didn't want as our first couple choices. Hell, I'd rather just get rid of Teddy and sign a free agent or draft a late round QB and roll with what we have while enjoying an 8th pick BPA and getting ready to take a QB high next year.

     

    Kind of with you but it looks like one may fall into our laps without a trade. So do you take say 4th best qb in this class (which is great) or 1st OT?

  3. I follow as much as anyone else can claim that they pay attention to Mocks, BPA, Team needs. I know most of this stuff has been covered but I feel that the dynamics of the draft are shifting. The very important QBs are real but the reality of every other position are starting to set in. Like Atlanta may very well love Pitts or Sewell just for example. People forget that teams have traded up mightily to take these spots. Just because they arent Qb focused does not steal from their value. With that said, reading McShays mock where we trade up 1, I hope our FO laughs at the thought. As much as I want one ,If 4 to 5 QBs go in front of us our pick will still be enormously valuable. Think teams are falling into range and we will land our qb. If we take Slater over Lance or Fields, I'll just sit back n eat the popcorn. Cheers my friends. I'm still like a 10 year old kid when it comes to draft time. In case anyone gives a damn this is my list

    1  Lawrence

    2 Wilson

    3 Fields

    4 Pitts

    5 Slater

    6 Lance

    7 Sewell

    8 Jones

    9 Chase

    • Beer 3
  4. Just now, panthers55 said:

    If he said that the first 3 picks were Trevor, Wilson and Jones and didn't mention another one and it is Detroit's pick at 7 the reasonable thing to think is that the rest are on the board and that includes Lance and Fields.  I guess what you call changing the goal posts, I would call reading comprehension and simple logic. My response was to the question of whether we would make the move if we thought someone else would jump ahead. I told him why I wouldn't make the trade at that point either. No one talked about something before that. Try to keep up.

    Hell of an assumption there Nostradamus!

    • Pie 1
  5. This Mac Jones to the 49ers crap sounds like it has some real legs. If that happens either Lance or Fields should be there at 8 (possibly both). So I hope to baby Jesus the Panthers love the one remaining. Then again it may be time for me to stop sipping the Chris Simms koolaid. 

    • Beer 1
×
×
  • Create New...