Matt62881

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, the pressure stats he generates are bananas. I think with some other pocket collapsing players, he might be a 15+ sack guy.

Could use a #1 corner too, would help him get home more by giving him the time. 

5 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

ive seen nothing from pride that says he can be a big time player

He doesn't have to be a #1, he wasn't drafted to be. Filling a #2 or #3 role still makes him a good pick. If we don't go Qb, I think we draft a #1 CB this year. The sting of loosing Bradberry won't be over until we do. 

This just reaffirms my expectations of a good future. Roy is excellent depth playing a position that we have lacked depth at. Pride played well for where he was drafted and will only improve, Daley has showed he could play and I could see Miller being a great rotational piece. We knocked last year's draft out of the park! I'm really excited! 

2 hours ago, trueblade said:

#asexpected

Draft a 3 tech project DT late and roll with what we got. We weren't bad at DT last year and we have more important needs atm. Obada actually wasn't bad playing inside on passing downs.

2 hours ago, Beerfacedlegend said:

The worst year and worst season bro 

You trying to see how negative you can go? LoL

Great foundation, Lots of upside

11 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

I think you're missing the point.  Drafting him was not a position of need which Igo stated he was.  It was a future pick.  In essence, Thomas Davis announced his eventual replacement in the draft.  Not a "position of need" pick by any means.  

Is a great asset and a need not the same thing? Not saying it was an immediate need, saying it was a luxury need, I mean we are kinda stacked lol.

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

I literally never said Shaq was a bad player. All I said was that last year's first round pick was not "In an area of great need". This has nothing to do with Shaq

Yea, wouldn't say it was a great need but a great luxury for a formation that we want to use.

2 minutes ago, SOJA said:

which he rarely played- now granted the injury played a role in that but Shaq didn't see significant time till the playoffs (Seattle or Arizona- then obviously more once TD got hurt)

I'm not saying Shaq wasn't a fantastic pick, but "area of great need" is a stretch

When he did see playing time he balled tho and now he's got a year under his belt.

2 minutes ago, Frank Hollywood said:

Not a fan of Derrick Henry in the first. His offensive line gave him holes you could drive a buick through. My grandma would have more than 5 yards per carry with that line.

I'd love a double dip of either Hunter Henry in the first and Sterling Shepard or Pharoh Cooper in the second.

Or...Corey Coleman in the first if hes there and Derrick Henry in the second if Henry is gone.

Coleman's long gone I feel and I feel derrick with our line and toldozer will have plenty of room, he is actually quite shifty contrary to what people think.

1 minute ago, nctarheel0619 said:

If he did, it wasn't often.  Hell, they had Roman Harper on TE's this year sometimes, and they started Colin Jones over him after Bene went out for a bit.  So, since you asked the question, how about you tell me................

He was a rookie, he will see more snaps this year...he really came on at the end of last year!

8 minutes ago, juliosantos said:

imagine getting both henrys our offense would be so damn stacked 

Two te sets and everyone's 6'5 250 lol

24 minutes ago, Dunn said:

He visited with the Seahawks, and I can't see them passing on him honestly.  He is a big physical running back, and they just lost their's to retirement.  With how successful that team was over the past few years on how their offense worked, seems like a no-brainer to me.  

Yes Russell did well when Lynch got hurt, but I still see them looking at the past 3 years and what was successful and take him as their pick.  

I agree, and this would make me hate Seattle more then I already do, as I see derrick as a steal...big and freakishly fast for his size.

Really sold on Hunter after watching highlights, looks to have good hands and if he's really that good of a blocker....we coulda really used that in the sb.

1 minute ago, Panthro said:

I really wish we got the 3rd for Hardy as I could almost guarantee Getts moving up in the 2nd to grab a guy he had a 1st rd grade on ala Funchess

We are teetering between higher/fewer quality players and lesser/more quantity players to fill out the roster

Guarantee we go lesser\ high quality..maybe 4 players out of the draft.

Which of the two henerys do you see falling further into the second giving us a better chance of trading up and nabbing him, I would love both! I really see us trading up a few times in the draft and snagging a small pool of gems.