Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks

21 minutes ago, CRA said:

The huddle wasn’t calling Sanders a 3rd tier skilll player when we signed him last offseason.  Probably don’t want to bump those threads.  

3rd tier no. Everybody said he was overpaid though.

(I will admit the signings look good so far)

I don't care how good free agency signings look on paper in March, and I won't care when the reports come out in training camp about how fast X rookie is 'picking up the playbook'. 

About 90% of front offices and star players if jailtime was an actual consequence of tampering

3 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I get that he sucked last year, but the optimist in me ask how any QB would be successful last year, much less as a rookie. Things like this don’t just disappear. He has many many examples just a year prior that proves he can make throws anywhere on the field. His college tape is phenomenal. 

 

Virtually everyone in the NFL  has 'great college tape'. It means nothing that he threw a long TD in college. We are yet to see him do it at the NFL level, nevermind consistently. I doubt we ever will.

26 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

We will not be using a 2nd on a RB. 

I don't see how a pass catching RB Bryce can check down to wouldn't be a key ingredient to a turn away. Miles Sanders and Chuba Hubbard are JAGs. The rushing attack sucks and a big reason DEs could pen their ears back nearly every play.

Am I crazy to think a (healthy) Mike Williams makes this team a fringe division contender? That would be three solid vet receivers on the team. Morgan was patched up the O-line. I don't think losing Burns will matter in the long run, and they can use the 2 seconds on either a RB or pass rusher or both and if (huge if) Bryce turns into a competent QB next year the season might not be a disaster. 

Morgan cooking

Have they tried turning the super processor computer off and then on again

3 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

To all the people saying we will guaranteed get at least a first for burns, here is me saying I told you so...

The fact many of us thought we would get a first rounder + either a somewhat good player or a 3rd/4th rounder was even more foolish.

Good for Burns though - he found a team foolish enough to give him a crazy contract. 

Its crazy because it doesn't feel like the Giants are 'one piece away' or anything. They still need a QB. This is a CPU in Madden type of move for them. 

I mean they choose 5'6 Bryce Young over Stroud what more needs to be said

1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yep and look at next years QB class… it’s not good

I know they’re not but good lord they needed to do their homework on this years class. I’d take a QB at 33 and not think twice if someone falls 

If Bryce didn’t look like absolute dog sh!t last year we wouldn’t be going full blown rebuild and taking on these crazy dead money hits

So they know Bryce ain’t it but will they actually take a swing at 33? I doubt it. Probably build an OL and get ready for next QB

They are going to tank for 2 years with Bryce, maybe 3. After 3 the roster will be NFL quality again and it would make sense to get another QB in the draft at that point. 

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

I give it about to week 3 until Panthers fans realize that any team will score 30+ on us.

Yeah I think that is the point

I like the deal for us. What are the Giants thinking paying him that LMAOOO that fanbase will hate him by week 3

Washington Football Team was top 5

I don't believe anything that is reported about this organization. 

7 hours ago, CRA said:

a year ago, the board told me we were playoff bound baby!!!! with an awesome staff and one of the best rosters we have seen in a long time. 

The presumption was that Bryce would look like an NFL QB. Save for one game against the worst defense in the NFL he never did. 

1 minute ago, Steelo said:

Chicago isn't getting a 1st for Fields... If people aren't busting down the door to trade for him now, the closer they get to their self-imposed deadline the less likely they are to get a 1st. I say they get a 2nd/3rd and a mixed bag of picks in the later rounds. 

They got a first + Dj Moore for Byrce Young. 

1 minute ago, KSpan said:

That would be a coup, and Chicago with 3 1st rounders in the top 10, one of which would obviously be a QB... what a golden situation. 

I was thinking maybe a 2025 first and a second this year. Something like that

4 minutes ago, Htarnation4.0 said:

Watch em get him for a 6th round pick in 2034. 

Wouldn't be surprised if Poles got a 1st out of Atlanta. 

46 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Betting lines everywhere on everything these days... jeebus. 

They gamble on WWE, a fixed outcome and there was a line on whether or not the Titantic submersible would be found in time to save the occupants. There is no bottom and frankly I just hope all of these people go broke. 

I think Fields in Atlanta could be a problem. They are a 10, 11 win team with a decent QB. I don't think Fields has even 'peaked' yet. Could be a fun redemption story for both parties. 

Sam Howell sucks

Draft the homegrown AJ Brown to add an immediate vertical threat for Bryce, keep Adam Thielen for short and intermediate stuff. Upgrade the running game and we might not be a dumpster next year. If nothing else drafting Tez would be a morale booster for the  fanbase. People will hype it up and there would be talks of “maybe we have our franchise QB and WR” from the draft until at very least mid August. The Tez offensive. 

5 hours ago, 0kBoomer said:

Olsen is a panthers legend for sure but at this point is it even arguable that Kelce isn’t the greatest TE in NFL history? 
 

If he gets another ring this year he will have one less than gronk but his numbers are straight up better besides total touchdowns. If Kelce plays for 2-3 seasons he will surpass gronk on that one too. 

I think there have been more dominant TEs. Tony Gonzales, Antonio Gates, Gronk. Kelce also hasn't had a year where he had to play with a terrible QB, and guys like Tony Gonzales played in an era where getting the TE involved in the passing game wasn't a focal point.