Jump to content

Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks

  1. 14 minutes ago, Lemory said:

    If we are picking #1 overall we might as well take a QB because the Bryce experiment will have been a failure.

    I felt the same about this year. We were supposed to be in contention for a division title in the terrible NFC South. We ended up with the 'first pick'. Had they actually had the pick they would have taken Caleb Williams, so I don't even see the point of sticking with Bryce another year, other than the sunk cost fallacy. 

  2. On 4/12/2024 at 11:58 PM, CRA said:

    40 time is how fast you run a 40 though.   It's not exactly football speed. 

    Why do 32 NFL teams bother showing up to watch these guys run the 40 then? If we can just disregard it when it doesn't fit a narrative we have about a player?

  3. 3 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

    I get that he sucked last year, but the optimist in me ask how any QB would be successful last year, much less as a rookie. Things like this don’t just disappear. He has many many examples just a year prior that proves he can make throws anywhere on the field. His college tape is phenomenal. 

     

    Virtually everyone in the NFL  has 'great college tape'. It means nothing that he threw a long TD in college. We are yet to see him do it at the NFL level, nevermind consistently. I doubt we ever will.

    • Beer 1
    • Flames 1
  4. 26 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

    We will not be using a 2nd on a RB. 

    I don't see how a pass catching RB Bryce can check down to wouldn't be a key ingredient to a turn away. Miles Sanders and Chuba Hubbard are JAGs. The rushing attack sucks and a big reason DEs could pen their ears back nearly every play.

  5. Am I crazy to think a (healthy) Mike Williams makes this team a fringe division contender? That would be three solid vet receivers on the team. Morgan was patched up the O-line. I don't think losing Burns will matter in the long run, and they can use the 2 seconds on either a RB or pass rusher or both and if (huge if) Bryce turns into a competent QB next year the season might not be a disaster. 

  6. 3 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

    To all the people saying we will guaranteed get at least a first for burns, here is me saying I told you so...

    The fact many of us thought we would get a first rounder + either a somewhat good player or a 3rd/4th rounder was even more foolish.

    Good for Burns though - he found a team foolish enough to give him a crazy contract. 

    Its crazy because it doesn't feel like the Giants are 'one piece away' or anything. They still need a QB. This is a CPU in Madden type of move for them. 

    • Pie 1
  7. 1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

    Yep and look at next years QB class… it’s not good

    I know they’re not but good lord they needed to do their homework on this years class. I’d take a QB at 33 and not think twice if someone falls 

    If Bryce didn’t look like absolute dog sh!t last year we wouldn’t be going full blown rebuild and taking on these crazy dead money hits

    So they know Bryce ain’t it but will they actually take a swing at 33? I doubt it. Probably build an OL and get ready for next QB

    They are going to tank for 2 years with Bryce, maybe 3. After 3 the roster will be NFL quality again and it would make sense to get another QB in the draft at that point. 

×
×
  • Create New...