Jump to content

Jeremy Igo

MFCEO
  • Posts

    23,782
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jeremy Igo

  1. 1 hour ago, chknwing said:

    not sure if this had been posted but he is an interview with Norman.  He is directly asked about holding out.  It was clear to me that hes just really optimistic they can work out a long term deal with him.  however he did kind of side step the question but did state if hes there for otas or not he still going to be preparing himself for the season.

     

    http://www.wccbcharlotte.com/video/josh-norman-talks-contract-holdout-running-with-the-bulls/

    Sounds perfectly in line with my OP. 

  2. There has been some chatter about a possible Josh Norman holdout this year. As someone who has spent a good amount of time speaking with Josh over the past year, I thought I would chime in with my two cents. 

    Josh has not signed his tender, does that mean he is holding out?

    No, it means he has not signed his tender. He has until July 15 to sign. 

    Why would he not sign his tender?

    Signing the tender would all but erase any leverage he currently has in negotiations for a long term contract. 

    Will Josh miss Offseason Team Activities (OTAs)

    Very possible, although the first weeks of OTAs are not mandatory to begin with. The Panthers have had 100% full voluntary participation for several seasons now (except for rookies finishing school who were not permitted to attend). Josh could very well end that streak. 

    If he misses OTA's, isn't that a holdout? 

    Technically, no. As Josh has not signed his tender he is not under contract. You cannot holdout from a contract that does not exist. 

    OK, so when will we know if Josh is holding out?

    You will know at the start of training camp. Long time Panthers fans remember the panic surrounding Jon Beason and his brief holdout. It happens. 

    But hasn't Josh promised not to hold out? 

    I have heard this said, but I have seen no quotations on him saying it. 

    It looks like it all stems from this good Jonathan Jones piece in the observer. Jones says... 

    Quote

    Norman put two ideas to rest in the Friday interview. The first is the specter of a training camp holdout if he and the team don’t reach a long-term agreement by July 15. A holdout, he said, would do nothing for his contract situation or his teammates.

     but there is no Josh Norman quotation given from what I could find. 

    So language becomes a big factor here. Did Josh Norman say he had no plans on holding out? Well, plans change. That is not a promise. Did Norman simply say "a holdout would do nothing for my contract situation or my team"? Well, thats not a promise either. That is a really nice PC answer that would not create more tension in contract negotiations between parties. 

    OK, Igo, enough with the talk. Do you feel Josh will holdout? 

    Yes, it could happen. 

    Best case scenario is Josh and the Panthers come to a long term agreement. This is unlikely as they have been worlds apart on numbers starting last season. 

    Worst case scenerio? No deal is reached, Norman holds out into the season. Again, unlikely as this will hurt both parties involved. 

    So, what we have here is an old fashioned staring contest, Gettleman vs Norman. You know how competitive and "win at all cost" Josh Norman is on the field, well, that applies to every aspect of his life as well. 

    Therefore, some sort of holdout into training camp is a definite possibility. I have spoken in depth with Josh over what this next contract means to him. You cannot overstate how important he feels it is, and I can see where he is coming from. I honestly would not blame him for doing anything he can possibly do to land an acceptable long term deal. This is why the business side of football is not televised... it isn't enjoyable to watch. 

     

     


    View full article

    • Pie 9
  3. 5 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

    I like both picks, but since our 3rd round pick this year is almost (basically) a 4th rounder, I don't see it having enough value to move us up from the second-to-last-pick in the 2nd round to picking in the top four to five picks in the 2nd round.

    But if Big Dave can do it, then I'm all for it.

    Didn't say it would cost only our third rounder. Possibly more. 

  4. 3 minutes ago, Bartin said:

    I sure think he's got a great chance, but I caution against assuming one great game in a big moment means future dominance. Larry Brown, Ricky Manning Jr, Chris Matthews and Malcolm Smith all come to mind. Not to say it means nothing because Malcolm Butler and Justin Tuck both went on to become stars after big moments in the Super Bowl.

    Looking at his entire body of work from the 2015 season is what leads me to believe he is on his way to becoming a stud rather than a MVP-like performance in the Super Bowl, but it is easy to get caught up in the hype since he was our only real bright spot from Sunday.

    You read the first line and stopped, huh

    • Pie 6
  5. 1 minute ago, Cracka McNasty said:

    Point 2 if - Johnson doesn't take a pay cut he's gone. The stuff about his relationship with Richardson is irrelevant considering Gettleman already axed Smitty, who Richardson loved.

    Gettleman trims fat and it got us to a super bowl. 

    That is what I was saying. I think the strong relationship they have is the reason he may get an offer for a cap friendly deal. If not for that relationship, he would be axed immediately. 

    • Pie 2
  6. 16 minutes ago, CRA said:

    you should be prepared for that.  It will be a heavily slanted Denver crowd. 

    Denver's fanbase is closer and Denver is going to get a huge chunk of the "corporate" crowd which dominates Super Bowl attendance.

    I am not so sure. A good number every year pull for the "cool team". Right now that is the Panthers hands down. 

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...