Jump to content

zacka77ack

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    2,116
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by zacka77ack

  1. Exactly what I was thinking.  He had decent DT's in Minn. when he was going off in the last 4 seasons he was with the Vikings, I'd feel that Star and Short are just as good, if not better then what he had in Minn.  

    the Williams wall was better than "decent" if I remember correctly.  But yes.  Star and KK should be a pair of great DTs to pair him with.

  2.  

    I agree with you on everything sans Shaq Thompson.  Shaq is way to unknown and for a long period last week was so non-existent that I didn't know he was even on the field.  That said, our defense will be fine against a Fosterless Texans team ran by either a Browns castoff or a cocaine addict.  Their defense could cause problems, but with how terribly they covered Kelce last weekend, unless they get their LB issue squared away, Olsen could break out which could make this a really bad weekend for the Texans.

    that's because Shaq WAS non existent. He only played 17 snaps because of the personal that the Jags were using.  Shaq is a wild card, a utility knife. He's an asset.

  3. His negatives far outweighed the positives, for me at least.  He couldn't catch, or shoot, or dribble, or pass...in turn, limiting an already limited offense.

    Sucks to lose the defense/rebounding...but it looks like they're not planning on doing those things anyway.  

     

    Skal Labissiere, come on down. 

    1 Ben Simmons please. Don't even care about our PF Log Jam.
  4. You are assuming the Hornets have an actual plan. What in their history makes you think they do?

    That one time that they uh...well then there was the time that Cho...hang on. Oh yea! Don't forget about that deal that... I got nothing.
    • Pie 2
  5. There's no way the Hornets draft Kaminsky. Are they planning on playing him and Al at the 4 and 5? I could score in the paint on those 2. The Warriors would come to town and they would even bother shooting 3. They would just feed the post all day and score at will on Al and Frank.

  6. ​The website i saw was all New England stuff and Boston teams.  Even had a Boston College and Syracuse logo.  I'd crap in their toilet and wouldn't flush.

    Interesting. I've never been in there (last time I checked they required a "membership"). I prefer to hoop and hollar in the privacy of my living room, anyway. But they're listed as a place to watch Panther games.
  7. ​i don't know what i'd even write about. poop jokes are already taken and i disguise my atrocious football acumen with snark and wheedling

    Then I'll piggy back on your hard work and at the end of the blog I'll write a review of one of our fine restaurant and if you should watch a game there (the answer will be "No" everytime except for the one time I write about Stumble Stilskins).
    • Pie 1
  8. i like the idea.

    the only potential concern i can think of would be individual blogs with threads developing on the comments sections could cause confusion on similar topics in the main forum. like if mr. scot makes a blog post and then someone else makes a thread on the same topic whose platform is the best to discuss it, mr. scot's or the main one?

    does the main forum (no doubt one of the key attracting features for new members) lose out on content as a result?

    secretly i'm just worried that no one will like my blog.

    You could title your blog "Growlin' from Greensboro". We need someone to rep the 336.
    • Pie 3
×
×
  • Create New...