uncfan888

17 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

6 wins

That would be a good first year improvement 

Just now, frankw said:

Lmao traded back again.

Dan Morgan spent too much time around Scott Fitterer.

I feel like our piece of poo owner that can't even stand a bar sign talking about him is pulling these strings

It's fitterer all over again. fug David tepper

9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Who are these two #1 WR’s you speak of?

For real. Until proven otherwise, the two WRs we got are 

They're setting up the quarterback for success. Whether it's him or someone else in next year's draft. Hopefully it's him because that makes things considerably better for us in the long run

Meh. Should have just picked at 39. This is too fitterer-esque for me

We don't need a draft haul. We need to quit trying to overthink things and draft at 33 and 39

28 minutes ago, IceUpSun said:

There would be if the mods didn't immediately ban me every time I create an account hopefully they won't this time. I'm always here regardless and have been since '06 .. GoCarolina8990 .. anyway mods .. seriously, let me keep an account this time.

 

They probably ban you cuz the stuff you post is idiotic and spammy

Cool.. Maybe he can play for us for a year and then go back to the Bengals while we pay most of his salary just like vonn bell

Dude signed a 2 year contract with us in March of 21 and was released in September. Fitterer magic baby

15 mil? Nah

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

For a reasonable price given his injury history I'm fine with it. No reason not to kick the tires. Get the deal done tonight.

At least he and Jaycee can play battleship together in the physical therapy room after week 3

3 hours ago, The Huddler said:

the next QB wont be for another 15 years. These OL players will all have their knee replacements by then. 

That's the best case scenario for us

2 hours ago, CRA said:

well, last year there was no excuses for him not to sleepwalk to the playoffs with the best roster since 2003/2011 assembled around him.   Like, I said, this all just feels the same. 

Canales didn't run a O last year that seems ideal for Bryce Young.  Skill talent is largely the same.  We replaced Chark with a more talented headache on the outside.   And that outside WR spot isn't the main bread and butter of an anomaly like Bryce IMO. 

But there is time.  Everything I'm seeing and hearing to date though, seems like this O would be better suited for Jake Delhomme Jr.   

 

Yeah, we haven't even had the draft yet

1 hour ago, CRA said:

attempting to build a stereotypical offense for their non-stereotypical QB? 

I mean, I’m ready to move on from Bryce so I don’t really care.   But yeah, I’ve been clear since we drafted him the the only way I think Young can work is to to build him a Bryce dink and dunk O with their scheme and talent. 

Big picture,  we are going to likely have better interior OL play and slightly better playcalling.  

I mean, this is a Mike Williams thread.  What type of O did  Canales run  in Tampa?  The only addition skill talent wise to date is problem wideout the Steelers tried to deal for a year and couldn’t that plays on the outside.  Big picture I don’t dislike what they are doing to fix the O…but it’s still IMO a variation of last year where it’s not going to be catering to an anomaly QB.  

I think we drafted an anomaly QB….and still have not come to terms with that. 

and the talk/mood just feels like last year on repeat for me.  I was never it’s an all Bryce Young sucks guy either.  I didn’t like what they were putting him into from the jump when so many were talking playoffs and best roster since 2003 type stuff.  I still don’t like what they are putting him in….at least to date.  I don’t think we are going to put him in position again this year to help him reach his potential. 
 

 

They're making these moves so there's no excuses for him. This time next year if bryce didn't improve substantially, we'll be moving on. At least the next qb may have a decent line and some weapons to work with

6 hours ago, OldhamA said:

When do we get to pick between Bryce Young and a competent NFL QB?

This time next year

15 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

So why waste another pick when you can just roll with Bryce and make that decision in 2025 and use the capital saved to address other needs?

It would just be more poor asset management throwing more draft picks at QBs when the team as a whole was a dumpster fire last season.

Give Bryce another shot and see what we actually have.

Yeah there's no point signing fields cuz he's not the answer either. Unfortunately the draft class of QBs next year doesn't look promising 

So the steelers got Mr unlimited and then traded for Justin fields to be a backup? Weird 

48 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

Canales would be pretty stupid not to want to retain Evero. 

And that doesn't have anything to do with what I said. I was talking about tepper meddling 

3 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Not sure anyone was upset about Evero staying.

Nobody was. People did have issue with tepper sticking his nose in things and making canales keep evero. If canales wanted him with no badgering from tepper, then theres no problem

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

He’s probably comparable to YGM

This whole comparing his stats against Burns numbers is insane 

Nah I'm not comparing him to burns. Just comparing him to what we have currently 

14 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

You guys just see 8 sacks and think he’s like that. He’s not 

He's better than what we had and he didn't break the bank. Still should try to draft a DE or bring someone else in

I beat you haha 

OK I'm good with that contract