Jump to content

LegioX

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    1,659
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LegioX

  1. Just now, *FreeFua* said:

    So you’d rather roll with those 2 and Teddy instead? 

    Roll the dice on whoever is left at 8?

    Or trade next years 1st and a few other picks for Fields or Lance? Sounds like the Jets will ultimately end up taking Wilson. 
     

    Chinn is my fav Panther but if it’s him or Watson, I’m taking the top 5 QB without batting an eye

    I don’t believe in stripping down everything on our team for 1 player. The risk are to damn high. We have a fiery, young, and aggressive defense. Yes I will be pissed if we lose it just like that with a “snap” of thanos fingers. But hey, I’m just one guy in this thing. So people don’t give it a poo about my feelings.

    • Pie 3
    • Beer 1
  2. 17 minutes ago, manu4t said:

    I defend large companies all the time in court so I can assure you based on doing this for over 20 years this is hardly a "closed case". 

    To your points -

    1.  That is irrelevant because it is not a theory they can or would pursue against KC.  They would sue the insurer of the car Reid was driving (and get the policy limits undoubtedly). 

    2. - that is dram shop act vs a bar if he was overserved,  so agreed there. 

    3. - Incorrect. If they called him to come in to work or he was drinking with other coaches while discussing work, yes they can be held liable under multiple theories.  If the vehicle was owned/rented/leased/maintained by KC, they can sue.  If he was reimbursed for his mileage coming to or from work, they can sue KC. If a happy hour was coordinated by KC staff and he was drinking there, they can pursue KC. We can speculate all day but we dont know all the facts.  But there are ways to potentially pursue KC, these are just some of them.

    If the injured child can be put in front of 12 jurors (ie, they cannot get themselves removed from a lawsuit on summary judgment), I can assure you they will settle long before that happens.  People with cases far worse than this sue companies all the time knowing they will settle out of court simply because of the horrible optics if the case is in front of a jury (and in the news).  Does it mean they will win?  No.  But they dont have to win - they just have to get in front of 12 sympathetic people to get KC to settle out of court. 

    My opinion was based entirely on him acting and making decisions alone and independent from anything KC related. Yes it changes the entire landscape if KC officials were with him and “knowingly” let him drive while possibly under the influence of an impairing substance. Again like you said this is all speculation. 

    • Pie 1
    • Beer 1
×
×
  • Create New...