Moo Daeng

Moving him doesn't help us enough to go through the motions as he just has to be replaced. Draft a G/C now 

12 hours ago, philp said:

Why would he want to compete with Mahomes, Allen, Jackson, and Mayfield in the playoffs every year? It might be smart for him to want to hop over to the NFC.

He's a competitor not a wuss

One should use references like these before any discussion of trades or cuts.

I've noticed very few no what dead money is.  

25 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

"the plan" is a dumb meme. plans change. nfl teams aints soviet russia

compared to your brilliant plan where you accept less than is being offered

derp

Another nobody with a URL. Who cares.

Rhule is showing these guys what coaches care about and how to have a career. It's invaluable information that can set them up for life.

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

https://www.nfl.com/news/carolina-panthers-to-be-aggressive-in-pursuit-of-potential-deshaun-watson-trade
 

Those are two different things.  The question is whether this guy with a Twitter account knows that Watson wants to be here or is just referencing all the others Tweeting optimistic things.

High-school kid. 

https://overtimesc.com/nathan-fry/

there are going to be some disappointed people here

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

but Front Offices do get the word on what the buzz is on social media/online.  Maybe not everything, but they know when a fan base is really unhappy about X or want Y. 

 

Hopefully they never make decisions based on fans buzz.

Depends on your outlook. I hate Miami and love SF. It's one of my favorite cities on earth that I have visited yet. I would literally never live in Florida and Miami . But people are in to different things. 

9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

The best thing to do is sit tight and see what falls to us.  Then have a plan.

However, if you could get a Watson for CMC and Shaq and maybe a second rounder, you make that trade and trade #8 back for more picks in the 18-40 range.

 

You should probably do that but that's not a realistic trade.

I don't think a trading an 8 for a guy chosen with 26th who hasn't played a snap  is wise. The QB craze is getting nuts.

On Dan Patrick it was alluded to that there is a back story with Bieniemy that might be coming up in the vetting process that is eliminating him from serious considerations. I think it may go back to his time coaching at Colorado. I missed the very beginning of it. 

5 hours ago, Beerfacedlegend said:

Has one hell of a deep ball but is not smart reminds me of winston

He graduated already from Wake Forest. Do you know who he is?

He described the ultimate QB. Smart, leader, mobile, accurate, strong arm, processor of information. Seems he was sort of giving a slightly smart ass Belichickian answer.

He listed 12 but says over 18? Seems a little dramatic. Every single one in question plus 7 have to change to go over 18. That doesn't seem likely.

14 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

We would, and It is hardly absurd to think 4 QBs could go before us if you consider the fact that there are so many teams in need of a QB and those that do not might trade back. 

Jacksonville--Lawrence

Jets--Wilson is a reasonable projection, or a trade for a team who wants Wilson. Are they serious about staying with Darnold for another season?  If so, they could stay put and take Sewell.

Dolphins--I think they stay with Tua, but they will be approached by teams for a trade, so someone at #3 will take a QB or Sewell if the Jets don't.  However, Tua is LEFT HANDED, so is the LT that valuable if the stay with Tua? They will probably trade the pick--to a team looking for Sewell or a QB.

Falcons--I am not 100% sold on the Falcons taking a QB here--about 60% sure they will.  What rookie is going to be better than Ryan, and why waste a #4 overall to sit behind Ryan for a year or two?  You build the defense in Atlanta, and I see a top CB or pass rusher here.  Do they pass on Fields here?  I think cooler, smarter heads will prevail and they will build the defense and OL before bringing in a rookie QB.  Ryan has an expensive contract to break--so they need to think it through.  A new QB is likely to bust without a D and OL and the WR issues they might face. So they will assume #4 is a rare opportunity to take the QB of the future.  I think Fields is the pick, but do not be surprised if they do not.

Bengals--Another team that could trade back if Sewell is gone. 

Eagles--a Wild Card.  Are the committed to building around Wentz?  New coach--like Jets, Falcons, etc.  I think they are committed to Wentz / Hurts and will draft differently--they will get offers for a trade.

Detroit--I think the Lions want a #1 for Stafford so they can move up with the Jets or Dolphins to draft a QB. 

So, it is not unreasonable to see a scenario like this:

1. Jax Lawrence

2. Lions (trade with Jets) Wilson

3. Dolphins Sewell OT

4. Falcons Fields

5. Bengals Chase WR

6. Eagles Smith WR

7. Jets Lance QB

So it is not absurd--even if you only involve the teams picking in the top 7.  The top 4 QBs will draw interest from about 15 NFL teams that need a QB. 

Although historically 4 QBs have not gone nearly that high, I would not call it absurd.

I think we should sit tight and take the BPA.

absurd no, but pretty unlikely.  I can't imagine Lance going that high given his resume. 

12 minutes ago, Growl said:

the odds that four QBs go before 8 is borderline absurd, it's the absolute nuclear scenario, and in which case I'm pretty content to take guy #5 in what is apparently an even better class than we think, or laterally just take Sewell/top pass rusher and whatever it

We'd have our choice of incredibly good prospects.

Regardless of what they do I'll never stop being a fan. It's just sports for the sake of entertainment.

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

David Tepper has been preaching patience, long-term thinking, five year plan, etc.

If he turns around and goes into "win now" mode in year two after a five win season, I'm gonna be kinda disappointed, honestly.

Me too. I don't really buy that they will though. It's great for drumming up interest in articles but it's far from being a forgone conclusion within the circle of the decision makers.

If Igo Zod is in then I'm out. Pretty good bet indicator over the years.

2 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

i would be bitterly disappointed with 9-7

edit: especially in a year with three seriously weakened division foes

The Bucs will likely be better unless Brady's arm just falls off all at once. 

You will have to trade for Stafford at least a month and a half before knowing how the draft unfolds.

5 hours ago, cookinwithgas said:

I met him a couple of months after the SB and he was pretty salty to me so screw him no matter what team he’s on, I’ll never forgive him for sucking so bad

If you hate someone for sports performance reasons then you deserve salty treatment.

He was super nice when I met him. 

15 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

Think about how bad life would be if we won one or more of those 0-8 one score games!?!?

It wouldn't change my life at all