Ocpanthertew714

Juan be like:

Clearly he's being facetious.  I mean I lol'd

I'm not gonna lie.

I am going to miss the whole Bryce vs. CJ carousel.  The amount of pettiness some of you emulate is quite amusing. 

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is a devastating blow to the Young contingent if you're at all familiar with David Newton's track record. If there's a worse team beat reporter out there I'm unaware of him or her.

Right?

now I'm almost certain we draft Christian Gonzalez #1 overall.

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

Do we seriously need a thread every single time any reporter says the Panthers leaning Bryce or CJ?? 

Probably not, but we also don't need posters clicking each CJ/Bryce thread and complaining about it.  Have you tried avoiding the thread?

I feel like the data about larger QB's are more prone to injury can be relatively misleading.

Couple of things to note:  

1.  Correlation does not imply causation

2. Inferential statistics is simply storytelling 

But thought this link was very interesting:

https://webpages.uidaho.edu/~renaes/251/HON/Student PPTs/Avg NFL ht wt.pdf

This provides excellent insight into average height and weight for the QB

As for weight you will see a median of about ~220 for QB's

with a min of about ~215

(Granted, I do not know the year of this particular data collection date)

You will also see outliers of about 240 ( this is important to not because outliers can greatly increase your mean or average depending on your vernacular). 

QB- Avg. Height: 75.43 in Avg. Weight: 224.97 lbs

Why is this all noteworthy, it's because the NFL has a prototypical size for there QB's ( as with every position.  there are exceptions of course)

So there is not a lot of data on QB's who are typically much smaller than the "proto typical size".  which will naturally show that bigger/heavier QB's are injured more

In conclusion:  Of course some data will show larger the QB the more they get hurt, because from a logical standpoint: There is a much larger sample size to make an inference from.  

Am I right?  I have no idea. 

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

98.6

As to quarterback choices, like others I prefer Stroud but would be okay with Young

Rectal thermometry?

I mean it is regarded as the most accurate means of temperature taking. 

3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Why do we keep doing this?

Because it's our daily fix

25 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

We will surprise everyone and go defense at #1

Like I've said before

Whomever is picked, will at the very least provide hope to this organization 

30 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

The original thread isn’t even a quarter day old lol…. 

5 minutes ago, panfanman said:

I'm all aboard the AR train but not at #1.  I'm not even sure how a smoke screen works when you're holding the #1 pick unless you're more than casually interested in trading back.

I'm curious tho as someone supposedly on the AR train.

If he is what this organization deems to be the franchise, does it really matter where he is selected?

I kinda love it

We live or die by this pick.

This takes balls. No matter what imma love this organization till the end 

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Thread police in full effect 

Let us get our draft fix for another 3 weeks please!!!

I actually enjoyed that article. Although, I disagree with some of the assessments, nonetheless great article. 

We should still have a huddle draft party. You know for the ones that live 3000 miles away lol.

1 hour ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Accuracy and lack of experience primarily. He played all of 12 games or so at Florida and didn't throw all that amazingly. His accuracy issues don't seem to be correctible like Allen's were based on his poor footwork. He just misses randomly. 

He does seem to read the field well and navigates the pocket better than anyone in the draft save for Young, He is a legitimate running threat at the next level as he is built like Cam but even faster, plus the howitzer attached to his right shoulder make him intriguing. 

But overall lack of experience and accuracy issues make him a huge risk.

hmmm... interesting.

I would be more concerned with accuracy issues than experience imo.

Also, I just read an article that AR (like Levis) had a similar situation in terms of a poor supporting cast.  However, I don't buy into that being a contributing factor of less-than-stellar accuracy.  

I absolutely love this guy's physical traits.  I would be more surprised than upset if we pick him.

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

The don't sit the man.  Let him play right away like they did with Allen.

Im curious: 

what's the biggest knock about him,  accuracy issues, processing? 

6 hours ago, TheWiz said:

Thanks. Didnt know it was already posted. I tried to scower the huddle but you guys are quick.

who cares, I needed my fix for the day

I love AR as a prospect, but there's in no way in today's NFL that a #1 overall prospect can sit a few seasons.  in that regard, is why I do not see AR as a plausible option given what we gave up in the trade.

Just the idea of drafting Levis #1 overall:

At least are colors aren't poo brown like the browns (pun intended)

Will always love DJ as a Panther

but I would love even more if we found our guy this draft

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ron, you better just hope my guy Sam Howell can save your ass because the only time you've ever resembled a competent NFL HC is when Cam Newton was doing his best Superman impressions. Now granted, that's still more than Tepper has managed to achieve as an owner but I'm just sayin'...

Sam Howell:

I'm curious here,

Is he foreshadowing his time with the Commanders is coming to an end?