Krovvy
-
Posts
3,795 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Krovvy
-
Yeah man, that's totally why Sam underthrew him. Great quarterbacks always throw short into double coverage. Clowns. -
Yeah, 43 yards, two interceptions.
-
It's not weird, I'm the one extrapolating. And if you think 15/32 is good, okay, but it's not, especially when considering historic rushing numbers, would-be interceptions, and the level of play of opponents.
-
If D.J. Moore wasn't so good at turning into a defensive back then Sam wouldn't even have "decent" statistics.
-
It's low because losers put the bar there because they for some reason do. Why is that reason?
-
Oh bruh.
-
Oh no, they haven't. Sam is in fact a bust, as we've agreed. I'm just giving you the reasoning why Sam shouldn't be signed, which is what the Panthers will look at. They will not just take some myopic view of him, looking into these six games. At the very least they'll also be looking at film, including his first disastrous year in Carolina where he was benched.
-
Yes, Sam Darnold had 43 passing yards against the playoff eliminated Saints yesterday.
-
Do you not think it's a bit odd that you're hyper focusing on 6 games where the Panthers had historic rushing numbers against generally bad teams? Is it not fair to include his other four seasons, including his last season in Carolina? Why is it that we have to look at these 6 games ignoring his career? Why is the bar so low for Sam Darnold?
-
Not a bust by the way.
-
Listen, if you consider this decent. Then you're reverting back to your old self I guess.
-
I cannot tell if this is sarcasm or not.
-
Remember when Cam Newton didn't have receivers? Oh yeah, he was the MVP that year. Meanwhile Sam Darnold is throwing rainbows to defensive backs and we have our number one receiver having to take their heads off save the interceptions.
-
Can someone explain to me how Sam Darnold still has "potential" but Justin Fields is supposedly a certified bust?
-
This is some clown poo. We actually have posters still arguing one of the worst quarterbacks in the NFL the last 5 years deserves another contract. Sam Darnold, in his best 'year' is "average" if you extrapolate the metrics from 6 games where the team put up historic rushing numbers.
-
You guys do realize Sam Darnold is not a rookie, right?
-
That is a very low bar, especially given that the NFL is now 17 games.
-
Here's a Windy City Gridiron thread for example.
-
Yeah, so let's take his career year and extrapolate then. He had a 58% completion percentage, 1,100 yards, 7 touchdowns, 3 interceptions, and 6 fumbles in 6 games. So, Sam would have 3238 Yards, 20 touchdowns, 9 interceptions, 17 fumbles in the now 17 game season. Keep digging holes boys.
-
Apparently.
-
Looks like my post hit home.
-
By every conceivable metric Sam Darnold is not an NFL starting quality quarterback. It's plain to see in his career that he doesn't have it. The only people supporting him now are stubborn fans who dug their hole with blind support. A lot of these same fans for some reason really hated Cam Newton.
- 244 replies
-
- 11
-
-
-
-
What fan forum? Every fan forum I read from Chicago (reddit, sbnation) is heavily in favor of keeping Fields and those that aren't are generally mocked (though probably unfairly). Please link us to what you're reading.
-
If you want to get the #1 pick from the Bears, what's your move?
Krovvy replied to EgoDogg's topic in Carolina Panthers
I don't think this about people wanting to trade D.J. Moore, but about what Chicago will want. I personally would much rather go back to the Cam days of having terrible receivers, but a great (potentially) quarterback.
