Luciu5

In the comments he's asked directly...

quoted off memory, question may not be exact...

"So you have intel they are split on Stroud and you have intel on Carolina?"

His response, "That's what it looks like. Yea."

37 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

If rumor is true Houston likes Levis, might as well get Anderson and trade up (or) stay put at 12 for him. 

I've heard the Colts are definitely taking Levis at 4.

25 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Hes not a small QB, he's tiny. He's smaller than most of the people typing on here. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=average+size+american+male&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS867US867&oq=average+size+american+male&aqs=chrome.0.0i512j0i22i30l9.3375j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

And nearly 50% are obese. Talking about huddlers, that obsesity rate is probably even higher.

My god are you salty.

11 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

These dudes trying to make threads to convince themselves we aren't taking Bryce Young.

 

Tough times...

It's happening the other way to. Like the IG thread.

6 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

The 598 following for McCown was there in Edgar’s original tweet as well as this one you shared, it looks like he was following all of them all along. 

Or maybe he unfollowed 3 others to make sure his follower count stayed the same to make it look that way!

/s

Good catch though lol.

2 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

 

Or he was in the process of following all of them and Bryce happened to be the first one. Screenshot happened at just the right moment by some bizarre luck. Just saying it's a possibility.

4 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

I just hope whichever guy we decide on becomes a franchise QB. 

This is the way.

1 hour ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

How can anyone believe what these guys of the media say especially when the words "I Think" is part of their report.

1. Nothing's done till it's done. These media people always hedge just in case.

2. Even if they have firm confirmation of it, they have to phrase it that way. Sources won't allow media to make anything that sounds like an official confirmation until the team is ready. The media doesn't want to break trust with the sources, so will do as they ask.

1 minute ago, PootieNunu said:

Ah, there it is finally.

I'll say this, I think by this time next week, after the next set of 30 visits, we'll know more. Media types are either going to start being more firm on their beliefs with less waffling, or what is starting to look like a consensus will get more muddy like we've seen before.

Ngl, this is hard to ignore. Queue smokescreen gif.

I mean he's one of the only people that has been saying Bryce since the day we traded up. When he first said it, it was shocking because nobody else was saying that 4 weeks ago.

I think it's pretty tinfoil hat personally, but I'm gonna throw fuel on this anyway.

1 minute ago, Varking said:

17 TDs and 5 INTs through the Steeler game. 75.5 rating was his worst in that 9 game stretch. 6 games rated over 100.  4 rushing TDS. 6-3 after the Steelers game. 
 

7 TDs and 8 INTs in 5 games after. 3 out of 5 games rated worse than his worst game in the 9 game stretch above. 0 rushing TDS. 0-5 record. 
 

His stats before and after were wildly different. 

Thank you for this. I was looking for game stats for 2018 but couldn't find them. My memory was the same as frankw's. I coulda sworn after that game it was night and day.

41 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

can barely throw the ball 50 yards on a run will translate, it just baffles me.

You mean this one?

https://www.espn.com/video/clip/_/id/32569965

or this one?

or this one?

I have no idea how far he throws it, but whether it's 50 yards or 65 yards, or 99 yards, safeties won't be able to ignore it. He can clearly throw 50 yards and hit receivers in stride with his feet planted.

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

The NFL is the All-SEC players (and All-BIG10 / All-ACC etc) for the last 10 years stacked on top of each other. 

It pops off the screen when Young faces a projected NFL athlete (the LSU game in 2022 in particular is terrifying). He's not going to run away from DLinemen in the NFL. He's going to hav - which I have doubts that that he can do due to his size.

Nvm

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Why not say, "Of course his 40 time is good--he has been running it since high school!"

 

This is a good example but a bad example at the same time. If you run the 40 yard dash daily, you will get faster at it to a point. Better technique will get you faster. Better body conditioning will get you faster. There are things you can do to improve at it. I'm not sure how one would improve at the S2 specifically. 

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

Yeah I dont get it.  I doubt the questions are the same each time.  Its like someone taking the SAT 4 times to get a 1580.  Still a helluva score any way you slice it.  And good on him for actually preparing for what he knew would be an important part of his overall evaluation. 

The test doesn't have questions as far as I understand it. I'd call them 'exercises.'

2 minutes ago, t96 said:

"And of course, Young dominated this test too. In fact, he's been doing so since high school."

 

The quote implies that he dominated it since the first time he took it in high school. If he got a 98 or even a 95 or whatever a bit lower the first time he took it in high school that tells you it wasn't just high due to preparation. Also my understanding of the S2 is it's not really something you can prepare/study for to do significantly better like the SATs or ACTs. It's more of a processing test that you either have or you don't. Taking it multiple times can give you familiarity of course but I don't think it's the difference between an average score and an incredible score like Bryce.

 

I agree with this. Also everything I see about it talks about percentiles. I don't think this is a numerically scored test. I think it's a how well have you done on the test compared to others type of thing. Basically if the best guy took .3 seconds to indentify the object or whatever and the worst guy took .7 seconds, well .3=100 and .7=0, until someone does even better or worse on that exercise. I can't say this for sure, but that is the impression I'm getting since it's scored as a percentile.

I also don't think it's the be all end all. Just one peice of a puzzle. Would love to know more info, especially outliers good and bad. If they are trying to be scientific at all, they need to have it peer reviewed.

I feel like most people in this thread have no idea what this test is. Especially the guy who said he took it online lmao. It's proprietary and as far as I know, nothing else out there like it. From their website:

Athletes perform a 30-45-minute evaluation on a specialized laptop computer that measures how they process and make split-second decisions in their sport.

I don't think anyone is taking this test on some random website online.

23 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

It's all over his College tape. 

Also I've no idea why people have to be such dicks on here - grow the fug up.

Weird. I've watched a lot of his tape. I don't see it. Analysts don't see it. I don't see anyone anywhere in anyway related to the NFL saying BY struggles with pressure. The stats don't back that up either. It's utter nonsense. Sorry to come across harsh earlier.

26 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Dude does not handle pressure from NFL athletes well AT ALL. 

Are you psychic? I mean how the fug would you know that? He handled pressure in college, from NFL prospects just fine. So I'm not sure where this is coming from unless you've seen the future.

Or are you....from the future???? Nah. I've read your past takes from all over Panthers sites.

52 minutes ago, rayzor said:

lol i'm a mod that keeps track of these things and i know that they are out there and i catch them when i see them and the ones you think are alt accounts, aren't. 

this place isn't "flooded with alt accounts".

we do have our fair share of paranoid wackos, though.

This might be a better question in DM, but I'll ask anyway. Are there rules against alt accts? Are you saying when you catch an alt acct you ban it? Just as an example (sorry to the examplee that just happened to be the previous poster), but is 'matt rhules gut fat' someone's legitimate account???? Like seriously? I've always assumed these dumb ass poster names were alts.

Again apologies to matt rhules gut fat. I'm hoping I did not offend matt rhules gut fat by using it in this manner. I have a lot of respect for matt rhules gut fat, but I have always assumed it wasn't a real identity. But I have no issues if someone truly wants to identify as matt rhules gut fat. I don't judge even though this entire post probably sounds very judgemental of idiotic names that only have a 3 year shelf life. Although matt rhules gut fat probably actually has a much longer shelf life than 3 years.

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

If you scroll down the page very slowly the password and link are before the paywall

Yeah the nevermind was an edit. I figured it out 2 seconds after posting; hence the facepalm.

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

This was incredibly easy to download for free fyi

???? It's password protected. Is the password 'password' or something dumb like that?

Nevermind.