csx

We are exactly where a realistic best case scenario prediction placed us.

2 minutes ago, Tomcatn said:

I can't seem to get the image out of my head of that A hole twisting Cam's ankles

Brian Burns ?

He's thinking "I have a limited offense with a QB who can rarely flirt with 200 yds passing and have a narrow path to victory ."

1 hour ago, Gipetto said:

Stop with these stupid ass threads. Bryce is the franchise and either you accept that or move the fug on.

We need a backup at very least.

4 hours ago, Car123 said:

Yes. Too bad Dalton has an absurd contract.

He doesn't. 

https://overthecap.com/player/andy-dalton/160

I dont care to see him working on catching on social media. That would mean its not genuine.

Try to trade him for anything 

We aren't getting rid of Ekwonu

Beating Tampa again isnt the only path forward 

Absolutely not

No.  They just had a bye 2 weeks ago

So  much for the tinfoil hats.

8-5......they had more penalties 

All that whining in first quarter 

Tankers delight

On 12/19/2025 at 11:41 AM, kungfoodude said:

I could only imagine how bad Sam Darnold would be in a Dave Canales offense.

I am gonna guess it would look a lot like when Sam Darnold was here the first time.

 

You've always had an odd thing with Darnold that hasn't held up well

It really doesn't matter who gets in the last 6 slots. 

17 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Weren’t we favored vs the Jets?

Yes. Favored by 1.5 on the road. No idea where these things come from. Still pretty bad though. 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/10/18/nfl-week-7-panthers-vs-jets-betting-odds-tips-trends-10-19-2025/86770681007/

22 minutes ago, csx said:

Manning and Warner are the only QBs to get in who played post 2000. With Brees, Brady, Ben R. Who won superpower in that same time frame its just not likely IMO

Superb Owl

Manning and Warner are the only QBs to get in who played post 2000. With Brees, Brady, Ben R. Who won superpower in that same time frame its just not likely IMO

29 minutes ago, strato said:

Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks. 
We are still a QB away. 

And we had both of the qbs we are worried about facing during that season  

Should have resigned Darnold even if determined to draft one high

Neither are HOF 

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

The NFL assigns the referee whose natural tendencies make the desired outcome statistically probable.

Natural tendency to make calls for the specific situation that day?

Im listening but that doesn't make much sense 

That one was tough with the stupid catch rules. Historically that wouldn't be a catch. Thats not one I'd be the most concerned about 

Some context. Even on the best defenses linebackers and secondary have similar miss tackles. Do those numbers mean anything?

Seattle and Houston 

Looking around the league it seems like Horns missed pct is significant but not sure the others stick out 

He gets some blame for missing key throws. He gets some blame for limiting the playbook per Canales words.