csx

Voting to happen just about now at conclusion of the regular season.

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/ap-explains-voting-process-for-nfl-awards

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Rams -10

 

Damn

Same line as previous. Not shocking 

It will be announced beginning of Feb based on previous years

24 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think McVay will be underprepared again. I do expect the Panthers to be EXTREMELY underprepared by Canales.

I would say there is about a 10% chance we win this game.

It's not that we aren't capable, it's that the Rams won't be looking past us this time. It's going to be coaching staff versus coaching staff and their advantage will be one of the biggest we could possibly face.

I have no faith in Canales to have this team prepared mentality or strategically.

Many opportunities out there to be missed.

Id have preferred the 9ers but literal beggers cannot be choosers. 

Rams have the motivation and a very strong coaching staff to analyze the first meeting.

I cant believe we have people here who didnt want to see a playoff game in Charlotte.

Going West to SF again I dont agree either but could see some rational for the chicken little syndrome 

I dont believe op knows what the slang terms he throws around mean.

The more I watch it the more it's evident that its a flea flicker.

The line is pass blocking and Rico looking back almost instantly after he gets the ball

The line was pass blocking and Rico wouldn't have slipped if he hadn't tried to stop to toss it back.

1 hour ago, RevJ said:

Mayfield outgains Rico and Chuba.

Bucs outgain Panthers at a 20:1 ratio on the ground.

It's not Rico / It's not Chuba - Our OL could not move a stick of butter an inch across a red hot griddle.  Our DL wasn't much better - just pushed all over field throughout the game.  Bryce didn't lose this one, we were beat in the trenches - again.

It was bad but not quite that bad. More like 7:1

4 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

No way

Leggette isnt it. Horn very unlikely. It doesn't have to br a significant investment of draft or FA. But id hate to rest on the position. Need a complementary style to McMillan and Coker.

I dont get embarrassed for their performance. I am not involved 

48 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

That was pre game. It was on the FB page beforehand.

Though when I saw our procession of players rolling in it was apparent they were not going to win.

I am not glad. 

I believe we still need another dynamic playmaker.

42 minutes ago, Captroop said:

It only took 18 weeks for us to start using Coker as our WR2. But doggonit, we finally got there!

His most productive game was vs the Rams

Not even close but that's missing the point of why hes a disappointment 

Like she said. This is exactly what its for. It's not exciting but its what needs to be done.

If you made a Venn diagram of people who get emotional about AI content on social media and those who still bite on the op clickbait topics is there anyone not in both sets?

2 hours ago, kass said:

Doesn't coaches normally get hired in January?  And the new year starts officially in march? 

So could net compensatory picks depending on what his current and new contracts says about contract lenght and the wording of the NFL rules.

I would doubt coaching contracts follow same structure imposed by collective bargaining with the NFLPA. But who knows

20 hours ago, Shocker said:

ACC!  Now Bama beats Indiana to prove how overrated that league was

Right....they are 7-1 in bowl games

I would hope that nobody reads anything in to this one way or another.  

I was way wrong in assuming OSU would easily win this.

2 hours ago, Shocker said:

ACC!  Now Bama beats Indiana to prove how overrated that league was

Have you paid any attention to the bowl records?

I've seen this explained here before. I believe people glossed over it because it removed something to complain about and required them to think more than they like