csx

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Well the Rams finally got their edge rusher from Florida State.  They got to keep two future 1st rounders too.

 

Too soon?

They used a first to get him.

You literally never get bored with your bs thread titles and petty Twitter links do you?

6 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Never thought we’d have a coach close to my age. 
This team loved coaches that were in their 50 or looked like they were in their 50s. With Seifert 70s. 
 

Seifert was 59. He and Reich were only 2 hired above their 40s

Capers 45

Seifert was 59

Fox 47

Rivera 49

Rhule 45

Reich 61

Canales 42

7 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Who doesn’t drink beers daily 

Most driven successful people.

Plenty are.

I'm not. We have a ways to go building this roster. I dint feel locking in on a position is best for that

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

I would really love some evidence he's done anything, and if he has he's done a horrible job of displaying it as the so called face of the franchise #1 pick. Zero engagement

You really need to log off for a little while   

55 minutes ago, frankw said:

Are you new here? When you get some time today take a peek at our drafts the last several years. See if you can hold your lunch.

Tanking is irrelevant if the team can't draft even halfway well. Until proven otherwise that's the center of our issues.

Trading a haul to move all the way to 1 and not taking the best QB is just the cherry on top.

Go for a walk. Take up fishing.

Seems the tank afficionados would want to trot him out for a few years to rack up draft picks if he doesn't improve.

1 hour ago, frankw said:

It's a shame we've lowered our standards so far that to acknowledge or discuss this is considered over the line to some.

The lack of awareness on his part about this is too similar to Sam Darnold. At least Sam actually had all the physical tools. For what we gave up to draft him it's just very unfortunate.

It gets acknowledged and discussed in most topics and you post this in every one of them.

I'm not at all interested to know ahead who the selection will be. And I assume any info trail gets shut down once it's found out it's being spilled online for someone else's gain.

Not suggesting it's wrong to be interested in it but not me.

Ellis constantly tells us he's not a fan but that's clearly not true. The language says otherwise 

8 minutes ago, mccjeff said:

Yay! Another thread that turns into a Bryce referendum. This time with brand new, never heard before arguments.

Groundhog Day all over again. 

A podcaster a real podcaster?

Then it's written on stone. 

13 hours ago, RumHam said:

I CALLED IT

It was reported a good while back. Congratulations 

Even after this past season Sanders is a 4.8 ypc career. It's not unlikely a random draft able guy never does that for a season.

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

And we got worse when he decided to get more involved

Also doesn't help when you have to use 4 left guards and 3 right guards with a limited rookie qb. There was a lot more tangible problems before you can get to Tepper involvement 

Huddle: the play calling sucks, fire this coach

Also Huddle: How dare the owner use resources to come to same conclusion.....with some unrelated nonsense about owner vs fans calling plays

18 minutes ago, onmyown said:

If I had to choose between a random huddler and Tepper to call plays for my make believe team it wouldn’t be Tepper, just sayin

Fantastic application of a strawman argument right here.

Let's see how many times we can react to the same news.

8 minutes ago, Martin said:

I don’t get the obsession in trading back, moving out if a potentially great player at 33 and 39, and net a fourth rounder or similar. It makes 0% sense. Only way I would move back is if someone lost their mind and offered us a ridiculous return, I have no interest in the value chart. We need quality, not quantity. It was one of the many reasons Fitt was terrible.

Media filling space is how I see it

Good receivers are good receivers. I think too much is being made out of some special recipe for Young. 

Consensus Mock sounds like a euphemism for AI generated.

How would a consensus mock be done?

They're literally all meaningless to begin with. I wouldn't give it a second thought.

9 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

We've had neither strength nor conditioning on this team in the last three seasons, perhaps longer.

We're basically the SE Louisiana State Tech MudDawgs, pre-Waterboy.

I heard three of our big injuries last season were actually from playing Foosball in the game room. Joe Horn actually pulled a hammy reaching down to grab a bag of potato chips from the vending machine outside the DBs room.

Jaycee

And he's done it playing in the nfl. Not exactly easy on the body.

A look at last years #33 trade doesnt look very enticing. The idea of getting a first seems far fetched when looking at the Cardinals/Titans trade

36 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

This is silly. $200M of that was two deals. Does it matter when two multi-year deals started? Browns deal doesn’t even really start until the 2025 season.

The only deal I think doesn’t help us in the future is Clowney. If it’s not to prove or help out the offense, then it needs to be long term beneficial. Clowney will not see a playoff game with us so improving the D doesn’t help us long term.

Numbers are numbers. They aren't silly or anything else.