Jump to content

cardiackat88.

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    4,061
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cardiackat88.

  1. Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs.

    I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones.

    Lots of trash QBs go in the first round.

    I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.

     

  2. 22 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

    *a new contender in the Arch Manning sweepstakes enters*

    Can anyone remember this much hype for a guy who rode the pine behind a 7th round pick for two years? It's pretty wild. If his last name was anything other than Manning everyone would've forgotten about this kid by now and he'd have to be reintroduced this fall as the #1 QB recruit from a few years back.

    Those NIL deals are going to ruin sports altogether.

    Why would Arch Manning bother taking a snap in the NFL if he already has that kind of money?

  3. 8 hours ago, scratched said:

    So are we going to the playoffs this year? The answer is NO! We are in a rebuild, and right now we can get something for Moton. I guess we can just go 6-11 and do this again next year? So what do you guys suggest? Sign him to a new contract at the end of the year or let him walk after the season? Both of those options are terrible. Signing him to a new contract is crazy, and letting him walk for nothing is craZier! 

    Did you not see what happened with Josh Norman, Bradbury, Curtis Samuel, Deontae Jackson, Brian Burns and pretty much ANYONE this team has EVER messed up contract negotiations with? Its the same thing, over and over and over and over.

  4. 7 hours ago, TheBigKat said:

    Was it cost or was it scheme because both of those fellas were straight up beasting for the Redskins yesterday

     

     

    IMG_3002.jpeg

    This is the same team that declined a 1st round pick AND MORE for Brian Burns, only to let him walk for peanuts (Also see Bradbury, Curtis Samuel and Deonte Jackson).

    Are you actually suprised?

  5. On 12/22/2024 at 4:40 PM, 45catfan said:

    No, he's a game manager...at best.  We get to see next year. I think he's about hit his ceiling.

    If he completes his passes at a high percentage and does not turn the ball over, then whats the problem with being a "game manager".

    That's basically a QBs job, anyways. Taking the chances on big plays when its appropriate and the rewards outweigh the risk.

    It can be argued that the best names were so successful because of how well they managed the offense. Mahomes, Brady, Manning.

    Gunslingers like Favre, Winston, and Mayfield are super fun to watch and can be big play making, crowd-go-wild fun. They also tend to make extremely EXTREMELY stupid plays that lead to turnovers, putting defenses in poor positions repeatedly, and super frustrating unnecessary turnovers that cause the team to lose.

    • Pie 1
  6. 2 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

    McConkey has been pretty good but he also has Justin Herbert as a QB

    It's getting pretty obvious that Carolina has a "type" of WR they like to go for in the draft. Big, hulking, or physical project type WRs that aren't necessarily the best route runners or have the best hands, or separate the best. 

    Its a trend that's continued through several different GMs, coaching staffs, and even owners. It's bizarre and frustrating to me. 

    Id honestly like to go a year without burning a 1 or 2 on a WR this year. Because I don't trust their WR talent evaluation. Focus on defense and pick up some offensive players later if you want. 

    At least Legette showed potential and Coker is good. Take a year off from drafting WRs high...

    Yea we have been through that prototype for decades now and it always fails.

    The Steelers are so good at WR drafting that I almost think they come off of an assembly line with major brain defects as a side effect.

  7. 5 hours ago, frankw said:

    Have you seen the way we've drafted the last few years? We would have found a way to squander those picks probably. I don't like saying that but it's true.

     

    8 hours ago, Captroop said:

    Having first round picks is one thing. Using them wisely is another. You're giving us a lot of credit by not assuming we'd end up squandering that king's ransom.

    So? The outcome may have ultimately sucked but you DO NOT turn down that deal. You don't, period. Absolutely no effing reason fatboy did so and he should be ashamed of every calling himself a GM.

    • Pie 1
×
×
  • Create New...