Jump to content

Mage

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    6,152
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mage

  1. We didn't draft Trai Turner?

    Or sign Andrew Norwell?

    (how in the heck did these guys get on our roster?) :unsure:

     

    Can you clarify what you're talking about in reference to my post?

    I never said anything to imply Gettleman has neglected the offensive line in the past or is doing so now.  I said if it so happens that he does so on draft day, then we will (maybe...) have something to talk about.  Otherwise, this quote (the one of him saying Oher could solidify the offensive line) is meaningless to me.  So I'm not sure where this...

     

    don't go messing up his misguided hate. ;)

     

    is coming from.  I'm defending Gettleman.

  2. He might be the most overrated prospect in the draft.  He is still leaving off, for the most part, HS hype.

     

    When you watch him play, he doesn't look as fast as he is hyped up to be.  Poor route runner.  Not as physical as his size would indicate.

    When you take all of that in consideration with his problems off the field, I would be ticked if we took him in the 2nd.

  3. Also, finding a secondary as good as Seattle's is extremely difficult.  Of course they can get away with lesser play from their DEs.  Still, they go from being a great defense to an historical defense because of how good their pass rushers are.  Their lack of pass rush is why they lost to the Falcons in 2012 and why they went out and signed Cliff Avril and Michael Bennett in 2013 and both had a huge impact on the Super Bowl last year and Bennett in particular wrecked havoc in New England's backfield all night.

  4. Could be great without him too....

    Look at Seattle. You don't just build great defenses on crazy DE play

     

    You don't but Seattle's defense with Michael Bennett is a lot better without him.  

     

    Will we be fine without Hardy?  Probably.  Our front seven is extremely talented and I like the upside in our secondary.  Our defense is even better with Hardy, though.

     

    We don't need him nor do we need to throw buckets of cash at him.  I wouldn't be in support of that.  However, if we could bring him back on a cheap deal, I don't see why we wouldn't look into it.  Hardy makes our team better.

     

    NOTE - This is not me saying Hardy will be back even if we were open to returning on a cheap deal.  I'm not going to get into a discussion about that.  What I am saying is that our defense is much improved with Hardy on the field.  He is a top flight pass rusher.

  5. Everyone is focusing on his return skills and rightfully so but don't underrate him as a receiver.  Of all of the receivers I've looked at thus far, Lockett's route-running skills are among the best.  His double move is killer, sharp in and out of his breaks.  One of those guys who looks a lot quicker than fast although I'm sure he's plenty fast.

     

    Concerned about his weight but I like him a lot.

  6. I heard opening up the offense was the solution though?

    Our playcalling last week was excellent.  Newton was conservative, played smart, we established the run.  It could have been effective against a lesser than elite defense.

     

    This week?  Not so much.  Shula listened to the media too much.  Our offense is horrific to watch right now.  This is awful to watch.

  7. Jackson has no problem rushing for 1000 yards with defenses focused on him....can't focus on him in Atl.

    Turner was poo last year. Id say he is a good upgrade over what Turner was at the end

    Not efficiently.  He was just given the ball a lot.  He hasn't been all that impressive in awhile... certainly not someone I'm really afraid.  I do think they'll improve in closing out games because of him but otherwise, not worried.

     

    As for the article, I'm happy.  Newton seems to perform best when he is being criticized.  

×
×
  • Create New...