SZ James (banned)

Losing uncures everything. When you’re winning you’re perceived as confident, cool, collected. When you’re losing you’re perceived as obnoxious, arrogant, uncaring.

I don't think we're gonna fool anyone with this

HE WAS A FOURTH STRING QUARTERBACK YOU DUMBASS

Man what is y'alls problem

No QB has ever been worth the value of 5 1st round picks. The expectations are going to be huge on this QB and GM from day 1. The most pressure any rookie QB will be subjected to in NFL history, and there is no foundation for a rookie QB to stand on with the Panthers. Dynasty or bust. A single SB win in 10 years is not enough for this investment.

No one said he's gonna get killed after one hit. That wasn't even my point. To reiterate: You're the dumbass saying that the officials are gonna protect him from getting hit like they're gonna put up some kind of force field around him. BTW no one here is gonna poo their pants if the FO picks Young over Stroud even we have a preference for Stroud. By now there's been enough success stories in the league to prove that the height issue was overblown in years past. BUT that doesn't mean it isn't something that should absolutely be considered when you are comparing two QBs that are close potentially and skill-wise.

Also the injury liability part is only one facet, size also affects throwing mechanics and the tendency for balls to get batted down. Something that limited even the greats like Brees.

Not @ you but because the pro-young crowd will not listen to counterfactuals. The only defense against his size itt was that the refs are somehow going to shield him from getting steamrolled by a 300lb lineman or award us an automatic first down after the fact. At least you linked a study to go on.

No, you are cherry picking the size thing AND ALSO Stroud's tape, the thing you made this thread about. You are doing it intentionally since you're trying to limit the parameters of the debate for everyone else. If you're not willing to even consider why size is a huge issue, despite the MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE and NUMEROUS CASE STUDIES, then why should anyone engage with you on your terms? You're already proving yourself to be acting entirely in bad faith

Gotcha. Hopefully you also understand why cherry picking info isn't how you should approach anything

You have a tendency to discard the biggest flaw/strength when it serves your own biases

This is only coming from loud mouth chicago fans and big market media talking heads IE No one serious

lol

I can't tell if the "well the owners don't want to pay him all that cash!!" contingent are just dense or if they're intentionally missing the entire point when it's staring them right in the face

Why does anyone here have to prove anything we're not lawyers

blatant collusion lmao

Posting it because... well... you already know who number 1 is Click here if the embed doesn't work

HOF

WOLFPACK UNDERWEAR